📊 Lifestyle Match
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Aurora and Philadelphia
Detailed breakdown of cost of living, income potential, and lifestyle metrics.
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Aurora and Philadelphia
Line-by-line data comparison.
| Category / Metric | Aurora | Philadelphia |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Overview | ||
| Median Income | $89,300 | $60,302 |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9% | 4.7% |
| Housing Market | ||
| Median Home Price | $460,000 | $270,375 |
| Price per SqFt | $216 | $204 |
| Monthly Rent (1BR) | $1,835 | $1,451 |
| Housing Cost Index | 146.1 | 117.8 |
| Cost of Living | ||
| Groceries Index | 101.3 | 100.3 |
| Gas Price (Gallon) | $2.26 | $3.40 |
| Safety & Lifestyle | ||
| Violent Crime (per 100k) | 534.0 | 726.5 |
| Bachelor's Degree+ | 33.6% | 35.7% |
| Air Quality (AQI) | 34 | 40 |
AI-generated analysis based on current data.
Here is the ultimate head-to-head showdown between Philadelphia and Aurora.
So, you’re trying to decide between the City of Brotherly Love and the "Gateway to the Rockies." On paper, these two cities sit on opposite ends of the American spectrum: one is a gritty, historic East Coast giant, and the other is a sun-soaked, sprawling suburb of Denver.
But let’s cut the brochure talk. Choosing a place to live isn’t just about skyline views; it’s about where your paycheck goes, how safe you feel walking to the corner store, and whether you can handle a winter that lasts six months.
Let’s break it down.
Philadelphia is a city with a chip on its shoulder and history etched into every brick. It’s the underdog of the Northeast corridor—overshadowed by New York but fiercely proud of its own identity. The vibe here is unpretentious. You go to a dive bar in South Philly, and you’re just as likely to be sitting next to a lawyer as a construction worker. It’s dense, walkable (for a major city), and culturally rich. Think world-class museums, a legendary food scene (cheesesteaks are just the beginning), and a palpable energy that comes from 1.5 million people packed into a tight grid.
Aurora, on the other hand, is the definition of suburban sprawl meets mountain views. It’s the third-largest city in Colorado, but don’t let the city limits fool you—it feels like a massive, master-planned community. The vibe is family-centric, active, and outdoorsy. It’s clean, new, and designed for cars. Aurora is for people who want access to the Colorado lifestyle—hiking, skiing, sunshine—without the astronomical price tag of Denver proper or Boulder. It’s less about "culture" in the museum sense and more about "lifestyle" in the recreation sense.
Who is it for?
This is where the rubber meets the road. Phoenix and Philadelphia have a massive gap in median income, but that doesn't tell the whole story. It’s about purchasing power.
Let’s look at the hard numbers. Note: Aurora has a 0% state income tax, while Pennsylvania has a flat 3.07% tax rate. That’s a significant difference in your take-home pay.
| Category | Philadelphia | Aurora | The Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Home Price | $270,375 | $460,000 | Philadelphia |
| Rent (1BR) | $1,451 | $1,835 | Philadelphia |
| Housing Index | 117.8 | 146.1 | Philadelphia |
| Median Income | $60,302 | $89,300 | Aurora |
The Salary Wars:
If you earn the median income in Philadelphia ($60k), your money goes surprisingly far for housing. You can rent a one-bedroom apartment for $1,451, which is roughly 29% of your gross income. That’s tight but manageable for a single person.
In Aurora, with a median income of $89,300, you’re making 48% more, but your rent is $1,835. That’s roughly 25% of your gross income. While the percentage is slightly better, the quality of housing you get in Aurora for that price is often newer and larger than what you’d find in Philly.
The Verdict on Purchasing Power:
Aurora wins on pure salary numbers, thanks to Colorado’s booming economy. However, Philadelphia offers incredible bang for your buck. The housing index in Philly (117.8) is significantly lower than Aurora’s (146.1). If you’re bringing a Philadelphia remote salary (say $100k) to Aurora, you’ll feel the sticker shock immediately. Conversely, a $100k salary in Philadelphia puts you in a very comfortable position, likely allowing you to buy a rowhome or a condo in a desirable neighborhood.
Buying in Philly is a mixed bag. The median home price of $270,375 is one of the most affordable for a major coastal city. However, it’s a buyer’s market in some neighborhoods and a seller’s market in others. Fishtown and Northern Liberties are hyper-competitive, with bidding wars driving prices up. But if you look in established neighborhoods like East Passyunk or parts of West Philly, you can still find historic rowhomes with character for under $300k.
Rental Market: The rental market is competitive but stable. You get older stock—think historic brownstones and converted factories—which come with charm but sometimes lack modern amenities like central AC or in-unit laundry.
Aurora is a strong seller’s market. The median home price of $460,000 reflects the high demand for single-family homes with yards and mountain views. Inventory is tight, and homes move fast. You’re paying a premium for newer construction, open floor plans, and the Colorado label.
Rental Market: Rentals in Aurora are often modern apartment complexes or townhomes. While more expensive than Philly, they usually come with pools, gyms, and granite countertops. Availability is decent, but prices are creeping up as Denver’s sprawl pushes further out.
This is where personal preference trumps data.
This is the hardest pill to swallow. Both cities have crime rates above the national average.
After crunching the numbers and weighing the lifestyles, here is the final breakdown.
For families with young kids, Aurora takes the crown. The public schools are generally better rated than Philadelphia’s (a notorious struggle for Philly), the suburbs offer safe, walkable neighborhoods with cul-de-sacs and parks, and the access to outdoor recreation is unbeatable. The higher median income ($89k) supports the cost of living, and the 0% state income tax helps with college savings. The trade-off? You’ll need a car and a higher budget for housing.
If you’re under 35, single, or just starting out, Philadelphia is the clear winner. The cost of living is dramatically lower, allowing you to save money while still living in a vibrant, historic city. You can walk to bars, restaurants, and museums. The social scene is gritty, authentic, and diverse. Aurora’s suburbs can feel isolating for young singles. In Philly, you get a sense of community and culture that Aurora simply doesn’t offer.
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
The Bottom Line:
If you’re chasing affordability and urban soul, pick Philadelphia. If you’re chasing sunshine and a higher salary with a side of mountains, pick Aurora. Your wallet—and your winter coat—will thank you.