📊 Lifestyle Match
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Bellevue and Chicago
Detailed breakdown of cost of living, income potential, and lifestyle metrics.
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Bellevue and Chicago
Line-by-line data comparison.
| Category / Metric | Bellevue | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Overview | ||
| Median Income | $87,343 | $74,474 |
| Unemployment Rate | 3% | 4.2% |
| Housing Market | ||
| Median Home Price | $288,711 | $365,000 |
| Price per SqFt | $152 | $261 |
| Monthly Rent (1BR) | $878 | $1,507 |
| Housing Cost Index | 87.3 | 110.7 |
| Cost of Living | ||
| Groceries Index | 95.2 | 103.3 |
| Gas Price (Gallon) | $3.40 | $3.40 |
| Safety & Lifestyle | ||
| Violent Crime (per 100k) | 312.5 | 819.0 |
| Bachelor's Degree+ | 33.4% | 45.7% |
| Air Quality (AQI) | 25 | 38 |
AI-generated analysis based on current data.
Alright, let's cut through the noise. You're trying to decide between two cities that are polar opposites in almost every way. On one side, you have the Windy City—a gritty, iconic, world-class metropolis with deep roots. On the other, Bellevue—a sleek, tech-fueled, family-friendly suburb that feels more like a carefully curated community.
Choosing between them isn't just about geography; it's about choosing a lifestyle. So, grab your coffee, and let's break this down like we're planning your next big move.
Chicago is the heavyweight champion of the Midwest. It’s a city that feels lived-in. You don't just visit Chicago; you experience it. It’s the smell of deep-dish pizza in the air, the roar of Wrigley Field, the architectural boat tours, and a world-class arts and culture scene that rivals any city on the planet. The energy is palpable, the neighborhoods are distinct, and the food scene is legendary. This is for the person who craves urban energy, diversity, and the feeling of being in a true global city. It’s for the culture vulture, the foodie, and the person who wants everything at their doorstep.
Bellevue, on the other hand, is the picture of modern, Pacific Northwest serenity. Nestled between Seattle and Redmond, it’s the heart of the Eastside tech corridor (Microsoft's backyard). The vibe is clean, efficient, and outdoorsy. Think pristine parks, stunning views of Lake Washington and the Cascade Mountains, and a downtown that feels more like a high-end corporate campus than a gritty urban center. It’s for the professional who values work-life balance, safety, and access to some of the best hiking, skiing, and kayaking in the country. This is for the tech worker, the young family prioritizing top-tier schools, and the person who wants a calm, orderly environment.
Verdict: If you want a city with soul, history, and non-stop action, Chicago wins. If you want a polished, safe, and nature-adjacent community with a tech-centric economy, Bellevue takes the crown.
This is where the rubber meets the road. Let's talk real purchasing power.
First, the raw data. We're going to compare the essentials. Remember, these are medians, so your exact experience will vary.
| Category | Chicago | Bellevue | The Takeaway |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Home Price | $365,000 | $288,711 | Bellevue is 21% cheaper to buy a home. |
| Median Rent (1BR) | $1,507 | $878 | Bellevue is 42% cheaper to rent. |
| Housing Index | 110.7 | 87.3 | Chicago's housing market is 27% more expensive than the national average. Bellevue is actually 13% cheaper than the national average. |
| Median Income | $74,474 | $87,343 | Bellevue residents earn 17% more on average. |
Now, let's get to the "Purchasing Power" showdown.
Scenario: You Earn $100,000.
In Bellevue, your $100k goes further, but not as much as you'd think. Washington has no state income tax, which is a massive win. However, the cost of living (outside of housing) is high. Groceries, utilities, and services are more expensive than the national average. Your $100k in Bellevue feels solid, but you'll pay a premium for that pristine environment and access to tech hubs.
In Chicago, Illinois has a state income tax of 4.95%. On a $100k salary, that's about $4,950 gone off the top. However, Chicago's housing costs, while high, are more reasonable than Bellevue's relative to income. The bigger hit is the overall cost of goods and services, which can be high in a major metro. Your $100k in Chicago feels more like $90k after taxes, but your housing dollar stretches a bit further if you're buying.
The Tax Talk: Bellevue’s 0% state income tax is a huge financial advantage, especially for high earners. Chicago’s state income tax is a permanent drain, but it funds the city's extensive public services and infrastructure (like the CTA).
Verdict: For pure salary-to-cost ratio, Bellevue often wins, especially for tech professionals. The no-income-tax benefit is massive. However, Chicago offers a more affordable entry point into homeownership for a major city.
Chicago: The market is competitive, but it’s a buyer’s market in many neighborhoods. You get a lot of bang for your buck—think historic brownstones, classic Chicago bungalows, and high-rise condos with lake views. The inventory is vast, giving you options from the trendy West Loop to the quieter North Shore suburbs. Renting is a popular option due to mobility, but buying is a realistic goal for many.
Bellevue: This is a seller’s market, hands down. The inventory is tight, and competition is fierce, driven by a constant influx of well-paid tech workers. You’re buying into a community with exceptional schools, manicured streets, and high resale value. The median home price is lower, but you'll likely face bidding wars. It’s a long-term investment in a stable, high-growth area.
Verdict: If you want more options and potentially less competition when buying, Chicago has the edge. If you’re looking for a stable, high-appreciation asset in a community-focused environment, Bellevue is your target, but be prepared for a fight.
Winner: Chicago for public transit; Bellevue for shorter average commute times if you work locally.
Winner: Bellevue for milder temperatures; Chicago for more sunshine and distinct seasons (if you can handle the cold).
Winner: Bellevue, by a landslide. It’s not even close on the safety metrics.
This isn't about one city being "better" than the other. It's about which city is the right fit for you.
The data is clear. Bellevue wins for families. The combination of top-tier public schools, exceptionally low violent crime (312.5 vs. 819.0), abundant parks, and a community-oriented environment makes it a no-brainer. The median home price is lower, and the suburbs offer safe, walkable neighborhoods. The weather, while gray, is less extreme for kids.
For a single person or young professional in their 20s and 30s, Chicago is the undisputed champion. The nightlife, dating scene, cultural institutions, restaurant diversity, and sheer energy are unmatched. You can live in a vibrant neighborhood without a car, and the cost of entry (rent) is more manageable than in Bellevue. The social opportunities are endless.
This is a tough call. Bellevue wins for retirees seeking a safe, calm, beautiful environment with excellent healthcare (Swedish Medical Center is top-notch). No state income tax on retirement income is a huge plus. However, for retirees who crave culture, walkability, and a more vibrant social scene, Chicago (specifically neighborhoods like Lincoln Park or the Gold Coast) might be more fulfilling. The brutal winters, however, are a major drawback for older adults. For most, Bellevue's safety and serenity will win out.
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
The Bottom Line: Choose Chicago if you want a city that lives—with all its glorious chaos, history, and energy. Choose Bellevue if you want a community that functions—smoothly, safely, and beautifully, with nature at your doorstep. Your call.