📊 Lifestyle Match
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Cambridge and Chicago
Detailed breakdown of cost of living, income potential, and lifestyle metrics.
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Cambridge and Chicago
Line-by-line data comparison.
| Category / Metric | Cambridge | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Overview | ||
| Median Income | $134,307 | $74,474 |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7% | 4.2% |
| Housing Market | ||
| Median Home Price | $1,126,500 | $365,000 |
| Price per SqFt | $856 | $261 |
| Monthly Rent (1BR) | $2,377 | $1,507 |
| Housing Cost Index | 148.2 | 110.7 |
| Cost of Living | ||
| Groceries Index | 104.7 | 103.3 |
| Gas Price (Gallon) | $2.83 | $3.40 |
| Safety & Lifestyle | ||
| Violent Crime (per 100k) | 234.0 | 819.0 |
| Bachelor's Degree+ | 82.7% | 45.7% |
| Air Quality (AQI) | 38 | 38 |
AI-generated analysis based on current data.
Let’s cut through the noise. You’re trying to choose between two iconic American cities that are practically opposites. On one side, you’ve got Chicago—the "City of Big Shoulders," a sprawling, gritty, world-class metropolis on the shores of a freshwater sea. On the other, you’ve got Cambridge—the brainy, compact, historic hub of academia, nestled right across the Charles River from Boston.
This isn't just a choice between a city and a town. It’s a choice between two different versions of the American Dream. Are you looking for a high-energy, diverse, and (relatively) affordable urban playground? Or are you aiming for a hyper-educated, safe, and incredibly expensive enclave of innovation?
I’ve crunched the numbers, walked the streets, and weighed the pros and cons. Here’s the raw, unfiltered breakdown to help you decide where to plant your roots.
Chicago is a city that doesn’t ask for your permission. It’s loud, proud, and unapologetically Midwestern. The vibe is a mix of blue-collar toughness and world-class culture. You’ve got deep-dish pizza joints next to Michelin-starred restaurants, blues clubs in basement bars, and a skyline that will legitimately take your breath away. It’s a city of neighborhoods, each with its own distinct personality—from the historic brownstones of Lincoln Park to the vibrant, artistic energy of Pilsen. It’s for the person who wants big-city amenities (top-tier museums, professional sports, a buzzing nightlife) without the extreme price tag of coastal hubs like New York or San Francisco. It’s for the hustler, the artist, the family looking for a backyard, and the foodie who loves a deal.
Cambridge feels like a campus that never closed. The vibe is intellectual, progressive, and incredibly walkable. The air hums with the energy of MIT and Harvard, and you’re more likely to overhear conversations about quantum computing than the Bears' latest loss. It’s a city of red-brick buildings, cozy bookstores, and farmers' markets. The scale is intimate; you can walk across the entire city in under an hour. It’s for the student, the researcher, the tech entrepreneur, and the person who values safety, walkability, and being at the forefront of what’s next. It’s less about "grit" and more about "greatness."
Who is each city for?
This is where the rubber meets the road. The difference in cost of living is staggering, and it directly impacts your purchasing power.
Let’s break it down.
| Category | Chicago | Cambridge | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall COL Index | 110.7 | 148.2 | Chicago |
| Rent (1BR) | $1,507 | $2,377 | Chicago |
| Utilities (Monthly) | ~$160 | ~$175 | Chicago |
| Groceries | ~8% below national avg | ~12% above national avg | Chicago |
| Median Home Price | $365,000 | $1,126,500 | Chicago |
Salary Wars & Purchasing Power:
Let’s play a game. If you earn $100,000 a year in Cambridge, you have a higher nominal income. The median income there is $134,307, which is nearly double Chicago’s $74,474. But Cambridge is a bubble of extreme wealth. That $100k will be stretched thin. After taxes (Massachusetts has a flat 5% income tax), you’ll feel every percentage point of that 48.2% higher cost of living. Rent alone will eat a massive chunk of your paycheck.
Now, take that same $100,000 to Chicago. You’re instantly in the top tier of earners (well above the median). The cost of living is only 10.7% above the national average. Your rent is $870 cheaper every month. Groceries and utilities are cheaper. Your purchasing power—what your money actually buys in terms of lifestyle, space, and leisure—is significantly higher.
Insight on Taxes: Illinois has a flat 4.95% income tax, very similar to Massachusetts. However, Chicago’s lower baseline costs mean the tax burden feels less punishing. The real tax bite in both cities comes from property taxes, which are notoriously high in both regions.
The Verdict on Money: If you want your salary to feel robust and afford you a comfortable, spacious lifestyle, Chicago is the undeniable winner. Cambridge requires a much higher income to achieve a similar standard of living.
The Verdict on Housing: For the vast majority of people, Chicago offers a realistic path to both renting and owning. Cambridge is a luxury market accessible only to the top earners or those with generational wealth.
The Verdict on Dealbreakers: It’s a tie, depending on your priorities. If you crave safety and walkability, Cambridge wins. If you can handle harsh winters but want a major city’s energy, Chicago is your pick.
After weighing the data and the lifestyle factors, here’s the clear, opinionated breakdown.
Winner for Families: Chicago
Winner for Singles & Young Professionals: It Depends (Leans Chicago)
Winner for Retirees: Cambridge
PROS:
CONS:
PROS:
CONS:
The Bottom Line: Choose Chicago if you want a dynamic, affordable, and spacious life in a major American city. Choose Cambridge if you have the budget for a premium, safe, and intellectually charged environment, and proximity to global innovation is your top priority.