📊 Lifestyle Match
Visualizing the tradeoffs between New Bedford and Chicago
Detailed breakdown of cost of living, income potential, and lifestyle metrics.
Visualizing the tradeoffs between New Bedford and Chicago
Line-by-line data comparison.
| Category / Metric | New Bedford | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Overview | ||
| Median Income | $53,583 | $74,474 |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.7% | 4.2% |
| Housing Market | ||
| Median Home Price | $454,500 | $365,000 |
| Price per SqFt | $278 | $261 |
| Monthly Rent (1BR) | $1,205 | $1,507 |
| Housing Cost Index | 98.9 | 110.7 |
| Cost of Living | ||
| Groceries Index | 97.0 | 103.3 |
| Gas Price (Gallon) | $2.83 | $3.40 |
| Safety & Lifestyle | ||
| Violent Crime (per 100k) | 567.0 | 819.0 |
| Bachelor's Degree+ | 17.4% | 45.7% |
| Air Quality (AQI) | 34 | 38 |
AI-generated analysis based on current data.
Here is the ultimate head-to-head showdown between Chicago and New Bedford.
Let’s cut to the chase. You aren’t choosing between two similar cities; you’re choosing between a galaxy and a pebble.
Chicago is the "Second City" that feels like the first. It is a sprawling, world-class metropolis anchored by the Great Lakes, famous for architectural marvels, a relentless downtown pulse, and a food scene that ranges from Michelin stars to the best hot dog you’ll ever eat (just don’t ask for ketchup). It’s for the hustler, the culture vulture, and anyone who thrives on the energy of 2.6 million neighbors.
New Bedford is the historic whaling capital of the world, now a gritty, coastal New England city. It’s got a working-class soul, a stunning waterfront, and a Portuguese influence that makes the seafood game unbeatable. It’s quiet, compact, and defined by the ocean. It’s for the soul who wants a slower pace, maritime charm, and a sense of small-town community within a city limits.
Who is it for?
This is where the rubber meets the road. We’re looking at purchasing power—how far does your paycheck actually stretch?
| Expense Category | Chicago | New Bedford | The Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Home Price | $365,000 | $454,500 | Chicago |
| Rent (1BR) | $1,507 | $1,205 | New Bedford |
| Utilities (Monthly Avg) | ~$170 | ~$160 | New Bedford |
| Groceries | ~10.1% above nat'l avg | ~5.2% above nat'l avg | New Bedford |
| Median Income | $74,474 | $53,583 | Chicago |
The Salary Wars & Purchasing Power
Let’s play with hypotheticals. If you earn $100,000 in both cities, here’s the reality:
In Chicago, your state income tax is a flat 4.95%. Your take-home is roughly $74,500 annually. You’re paying a premium for the privilege of living in a major hub, but you’re also earning more (median income is $74k vs $53k). The purchasing power is high if you live within your means, but the "sticker shock" for nightlife, parking, and events is real.
In New Bedford, you’re in Massachusetts, which has a progressive income tax (5% on most, up to 9% for high earners). On $100k, you’re looking at a slightly higher tax bite than Illinois. However, rent is 20% cheaper, and groceries are slightly cheaper. If you’re renting, your monthly cash flow is better here.
Insight: New Bedford offers better "bang for your buck" for renters and grocery spenders. Chicago offers a higher ceiling for career earnings, but the cost of living (especially housing and taxes) eats into that advantage quickly.
Chicago: The Buyer’s Market (Sort of)
With a median home price of $365,000, Chicago looks surprisingly affordable for a major metro. The Housing Index sits at 110.7, meaning it’s slightly above the national average, but compared to coastal cities, it’s a steal. The market is competitive but balanced. You can find vintage walk-ups in Lincoln Park or modern condos in the West Loop. The catch? Property taxes in Cook County are notoriously high, which can add $8,000–$12,000 annually to that mortgage payment.
New Bedford: The Seller’s Market
Here’s the shocker: New Bedford’s median home price ($454,500) is higher than Chicago’s. Despite a lower population (100k vs 2.6m) and a lower median income, housing is expensive. The Housing Index (98.9) is lower, but demand is fierce. You’re competing with Boston commuters and a limited inventory of historic homes. If you want to buy, you need to be ready to move fast and likely bid over asking.
Verdict: If you want to buy a single-family home with a yard, Chicago offers more square footage for the dollar. If you want a historic condo or a fixer-upper with sea views, New Bedford is your playground, but you’ll pay a premium for the location.
There is no universal winner. This is a choice between a lifestyle of immense scale and a lifestyle of coastal charm.
Why? The public school system (selective enrollment) and suburbs (Naperville, Oak Park) offer world-class education. The cultural institutions (Field Museum, Lincoln Park Zoo) are unparalleled. Yes, the crime stats are scary, but families thrive in the many safe, diverse neighborhoods. The median home price ($365k) gives you access to a backyard, which is rare in a major metro.
Why? Your career opportunities are exponentially higher. The social scene is infinite—rooftop bars, dive bars, concerts, sports. You can walk to work, take the L, and meet people from every walk of life. New Bedford is too sleepy for most young professionals; you’ll be bored in six months.
Why? The pace is slower, the air is cleaner (for the East Coast), and the cost of living is manageable if you own your home. The community is tight-knit, and the ocean is a daily tonic. Chicago’s winters are too harsh for aging joints, and the city energy can be overwhelming. New Bedford offers peace, history, and a lower cost of living for those on a fixed income.
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
The Bottom Line: Choose Chicago if you want to climb the career ladder, live in a bustling metropolis, and can handle the grit and cold. Choose New Bedford if you crave the ocean, a slower pace, and a tight-knit community, and you’re willing to trade job opportunities for quality of life.