Head-to-Head Analysis

St. Louis vs Chicago

Detailed breakdown of cost of living, income potential, and lifestyle metrics.

St. Louis
Candidate A

St. Louis

MO
Cost Index 96.7
Median Income $56k
Rent (1BR) $972
View Full Profile
Chicago
Candidate B

Chicago

IL
Cost Index 102.6
Median Income $74k
Rent (1BR) $1507
View Full Profile

📊 Lifestyle Match

Visualizing the tradeoffs between St. Louis and Chicago

📋 The Details

Line-by-line data comparison.

Category / Metric St. Louis Chicago
Financial Overview
Median Income $56,245 $74,474
Unemployment Rate 4% 4.2%
Housing Market
Median Home Price $235,000 $365,000
Price per SqFt $151 $261
Monthly Rent (1BR) $972 $1,507
Housing Cost Index 102.9 110.7
Cost of Living
Groceries Index 87.7 103.3
Gas Price (Gallon) $3.40 $3.40
Safety & Lifestyle
Violent Crime (per 100k) 1927.0 819.0
Bachelor's Degree+ 45.1% 45.7%
Air Quality (AQI) 44 38

Expert Verdict

AI-generated analysis based on current data.

Chicago vs. St. Louis: The Ultimate Midwest Showdown

So, you're looking at the Midwest and you've narrowed it down to two heavy hitters: Chicago, the Windy City, and St. Louis, the Gateway to the West. This isn't just a choice between two cities; it's a choice between two entirely different lifestyles. One is a global metropolis pulsing with energy, and the other is a massive, historic city with a laid-back, soulful rhythm.

Deciding between them can feel like a coin toss, but it’s a coin toss with thousands of dollars and your daily happiness on the line. Let's cut through the noise, crunch the numbers, and figure out which city is the right fit for you.

The Vibe Check: Big City vs. Big Heart

Chicago is a beast. With a population of 2.6 million, it’s the third-largest city in the U.S. It’s a city of towering skyscrapers, world-class museums, and a food scene that will blow your mind. The vibe is fast-paced, ambitious, and relentlessly cosmopolitan. You can catch a Broadway show, eat at a Michelin-starred restaurant, and watch a professional sports game—all in the same weekend. It’s a city for go-getters, culture hounds, and anyone who thrives on the energy of a dense, urban jungle.

St. Louis, with its 281,000 residents, feels like a city in a more human scale. It’s a city of distinct neighborhoods, each with its own character, from the historic brick buildings of Soulard to the bustling central corridor of the Central West End. The vibe is more community-focused, with a deep sense of local pride and a slower, more deliberate pace. It’s a city for people who want big-city amenities (major sports teams, a great zoo, a fantastic food scene) without the crushing density and relentless hustle of a place like Chicago. It’s for the person who values space, affordability, and a strong sense of place.

Who is each city for?

  • Chicago is for the ambitious professional, the culture vulture, the foodie, and anyone who wants to live in a global powerhouse.
  • St. Louis is for the budget-conscious, the family-oriented, the history buff, and anyone who wants a major city feel with a small-town community vibe.

The Dollar Power: Where Does Your Money Go Further?

This is where the rubber meets the road. St. Louis is famously one of the most affordable major cities in America, and the data backs it up. Chicago, while not as expensive as New York or San Francisco, is still a pricey place to call home.

Let’s break down the monthly costs.

Cost of Living Comparison

Category Chicago St. Louis The Winner
Rent (1BR) $1,507 $972 St. Louis
Utilities (Monthly Avg) $150 $140 St. Louis
Groceries 110.7 (Index) 102.9 (Index) St. Louis
Median Home Price $365,000 $235,000 St. Louis

Salary Wars & Purchasing Power:

Let’s play a scenario. If you earn the median income in each city, your purchasing power is dramatically different.

  • In Chicago, with a median income of $74,474, you’re earning more than in St. Louis, but you’re spending a significantly larger chunk of it on housing. Your money has to stretch further to cover the higher cost of living.
  • In St. Louis, with a median income of $56,245, you’re earning less, but your rent is 35% cheaper, and your home could cost over $130,000 less. This means a larger portion of your income can go toward savings, investments, or discretionary spending.

Insight: The "purchasing power" gap is massive. A $100,000 salary in St. Louis feels like a $140,000+ salary in Chicago when you factor in housing alone. If you’re looking to buy a home or save aggressively, St. Louis is the undisputed champion on the dollar-per-dollar value front.

The Housing Market: Buy vs. Rent

Chicago: The housing market is competitive, especially for desirable neighborhoods. The $365,000 median home price is just a starting point; in popular areas like Lincoln Park or the Gold Coast, you’ll be looking at well over $500,000. It’s a seller’s market in many areas, with homes often selling quickly and for above asking price. Renting is more accessible but still costly, and competition for good apartments is fierce.

St. Louis: This is a buyer’s paradise. The median home price of $235,000 is incredibly low for a major U.S. city. You can find beautiful, historic brick homes in great neighborhoods for prices that would be unimaginable in most other metro areas. The market is generally more balanced, with less frantic competition. This gives buyers more time to make a decision and room to negotiate.

Verdict: If your goal is to become a homeowner without being house-poor, St. Louis is the clear winner. The barrier to entry is significantly lower, and your money buys you more space and a better neighborhood.

The Dealbreakers: Quality of Life

Traffic & Commute

Chicago: Commuting can be a test of will. The "L" train system is extensive and a lifeline for many, but traffic on the expressways (I-90/94, I-55) is notoriously brutal. The average commute time is around 32 minutes, but that can easily stretch to an hour or more during peak times. Parking in the city is a nightmare and expensive.
St. Louis: Traffic is a breeze compared to Chicago. The average commute is shorter, and the city is built for cars. You can get across town in 20-30 minutes most of the time. The downside is that public transit (MetroLink) is limited, so you’ll likely need a car.
Winner: St. Louis. Less stress, less time in the car.

Weather

Chicago: Brutally cold winters. The average low in January is 21°F, but wind chills can make it feel like -15°F. Summers are hot and humid, with temperatures often hitting the 90°F mark. It’s a city of extremes, and you have to be prepared for a long, gray winter.
St. Louis: Winters are milder, with an average January low of 39°F. However, summers are famously oppressive. St. Louis is in the "Humidity Belt," and the combination of heat and moisture can be stifling, with heat indices routinely soaring above 100°F.
Winner: It's a tie. It depends on your preference. Do you hate freezing cold or suffocating humidity? Pick your poison.

Crime & Safety

Let’s be brutally honest, as this is a major concern for any potential resident.

  • Chicago: The violent crime rate is 819.0 per 100,000. This is high—significantly above the national average—but it’s crucial to understand that crime is highly concentrated in specific neighborhoods on the South and West sides. Many of the city’s popular North Side neighborhoods (like Lincoln Park, Lakeview) have crime rates much closer to the national average. It’s a city of stark contrasts.
  • St. Louis: The violent crime rate is 1,927.0 per 100,000, one of the highest in the nation for a major city. This is a sobering statistic. Like Chicago, crime is not evenly distributed. Areas like the Central West End and Clayton are generally safe, while other parts of the city face significant challenges. The perception of safety is a major concern for residents and a real issue for the city.

Verdict: This is the toughest category. Both cities have serious crime problems, but St. Louis’s rate is statistically much higher. However, the experience of safety in both cities is highly dependent on your specific neighborhood. Neither city is a "safe" blanket winner; you must do your neighborhood research meticulously in either place.

The Final Verdict: Who Wins?

After weighing the data, the lifestyle, and the costs, here’s how it breaks down.

Winner for Families: St. Louis

Why: The combination of affordable homeownership, lower cost of living, and more manageable traffic makes it easier to raise a family. You can get a great house in a good school district for a fraction of the price of a comparable home in Chicago. The city has fantastic family attractions like the St. Louis Zoo (free!), the City Museum, and Forest Park.

Winner for Singles & Young Professionals: Chicago

Why: The sheer number of opportunities is unmatched. The job market is vast and diverse, the networking potential is infinite, and the social/cultural scene is world-class. If your career and social life are your top priorities, Chicago offers a platform that St. Louis simply can't match. The energy is contagious.

Winner for Retirees: St. Louis

Why: Affordability is the #1 factor for retirees on a fixed income. St. Louis allows you to stretch your retirement savings much further. The slower pace, walkable neighborhoods (in certain areas), and excellent cultural amenities (museums, symphony, theater) provide a rich quality of life without the financial strain. The milder winter is also a plus for older adults.


Quick Pros & Cons

Chicago

Pros:

  • Unmatched Career Opportunities: A global hub for finance, tech, medicine, and more.
  • World-Class Culture: Museums, theater, music, and food that rival any city on earth.
  • Public Transit: The 'L' system, while not perfect, is far superior to St. Louis's.
  • Lakefront Beauty: Lake Michigan offers a stunning, beach-like escape in the summer.

Cons:

  • High Cost of Living: Especially for housing.
  • Brutal Winters: Cold, windy, and long.
  • Traffic & Commutes: Can be soul-crushing.
  • Concentrated Crime: Requires careful neighborhood selection.

St. Louis

Pros:

  • Extreme Affordability: Your salary goes much, much further.
  • Housing Value: You can buy a great home for an incredible price.
  • Less Traffic: Easier, quicker commutes.
  • Rich History & Culture: Unique architecture, a fantastic food scene (toasted ravioli!), and free institutions.

Cons:

  • High Crime Rate: A serious, city-wide challenge.
  • Limited Public Transit: You'll need a car.
  • Stifling Summer Humidity: The heat can be oppressive.
  • Smaller Job Market: Fewer opportunities compared to a global city like Chicago.

The Bottom Line

This isn't about which city is "better"—it's about which city is better for you.

Choose Chicago if you're chasing career ambition, cultural immersion, and the energy of a world-class metropolis, and you're willing to pay a premium for it.

Choose St. Louis if you're prioritizing financial freedom, homeownership, a slower pace, and a strong sense of community, and you can navigate the challenges of a city with a high crime rate.

Both are cities with deep histories, incredible character, and a lot to offer. The choice is yours.