Waukegan vs Philadelphia

Category / Metric	Waukegan	Philadelphia
Financial Overview
Median Income	$72,841	$60,302
Unemployment Rate	4.4%	4.7%
Housing Market
Median Home Price	$248,000	$270,375
Price per SqFt	$184	$204
Monthly Rent (1BR)	$1,231	$1,451
Housing Cost Index	110.7	117.8
Cost of Living
Groceries Index	103.3	100.3
Gas Price (Gallon)	$3.40	$3.40
Safety & Lifestyle
Violent Crime (per 100k)	425.6	726.5
Bachelor's Degree+	20.6%	35.7%
Air Quality (AQI)	34	40

Philadelphia vs. Waukegan: The Ultimate Relocation Showdown

Alright, let's cut through the noise. You're trying to decide between two cities that couldn't be more different: the gritty, historic powerhouse of Philadelphia and the quiet, lakeside suburb of Waukegan. One is a major metropolitan core, the other is a mid-sized city in the shadow of Chicago. This isn't just a choice of location; it's a choice of lifestyle, pace, and what you value most in your daily grind.

As your relocation expert, I've crunched the numbers, felt the vibes, and am here to give you the real, unfiltered breakdown. Grab your coffee—let's dive in.

The Vibe Check: Grit vs. Gratitude

Philadelphia is a city with a chip on its shoulder and the history to back it up. This is the City of Brotherly Love, but don't let the nickname fool you—it's a city of intense passion, from its die-hard sports fans to its world-class arts scene and revolutionary roots. Life here is fast-paced, walkable, and deeply neighborhood-driven. You're choosing a major metro experience with a distinct urban edge. It's for the hustler, the history buff, the foodie, and anyone who wants to feel the electric pulse of a city that helped build a nation.

Waukegan, on the other hand, is the definition of laid-back. Situated on the western shore of Lake Michigan, it’s a smaller city with a strong community feel and a slower rhythm. It’s not about hustle; it’s about access—to the lake, to nature, and to the massive economic engine of Chicago just an hour south (traffic permitting). Life here is more suburban, more car-dependent, and geared toward those who want space and tranquility without being completely isolated. It’s for the family that values a backyard, the retiree seeking peace, or the commuter who works in the city but sleeps in the suburbs.

Verdict:

• For the Urban Explorer: Philadelphia wins. Its density, culture, and sheer variety are unmatched.
• For the Seeker of Calm: Waukegan is your haven. It offers a respite from the chaos of major metros.

The Dollar Power: Where Does Your Paycheck Go Further?

Let's talk money. This is where the "sticker shock" and "bang for your buck" calculations get real. We're looking at the cost of living and, more importantly, purchasing power. If you earn $100,000, where does it feel like $100,000?

Philadelphia has a higher overall cost of living, but it's not as extreme as coastal giants like NYC or SF. Waukegan, while cheaper than Chicago, still sits in the expensive Chicago metro area. Here’s the raw data on the essentials:

Category	Philadelphia	Waukegan	Winner for Cost
Median Home Price	$270,375	$248,000	Waukegan
Rent (1BR)	$1,451	$1,231	Waukegan
Housing Index	117.8	110.7	Waukegan
Median Income	$60,302	$72,841	Waukegan

Salary Wars & Purchasing Power:
On paper, the median income in Waukegan is nearly $12,500 higher than in Philadelphia. That’s a significant gap. However, the cost of living in the Chicago metro area (where Waukegan is located) is generally higher than in Philadelphia. This creates a fascinating tug-of-war.

Let's use a hypothetical $100,000 salary:

• In Philadelphia, your $100k will go further for housing and daily expenses compared to similar-sized metros. You can likely secure a nice apartment in a desirable neighborhood or even a starter home. The lower median income also means you'd be above the local average, giving you a relative advantage.
• In Waukegan, your $100k is also a strong salary, especially given the local median. Your rent or mortgage will be lower than the Chicago city average, and you get more space for your money. However, property taxes in Illinois are notoriously high (often 2-3% of home value annually), which can eat into your purchasing power over time. Pennsylvania has high property taxes too, but Illinois often takes the crown for the highest effective rates.

Tax Insight: Pennsylvania has a flat 3.07% state income tax, which is straightforward. Illinois also has a flat tax, at 4.95%. For a $100k earner, that's a difference of $1,880 per year in state income tax alone, favoring Philadelphia.

Verdict:

• Winner for Pure Cost of Living: Waukegan. It edges out Philadelphia in rent, home prices, and has a higher local median income.
• Winner for Overall Financial Feel: Philadelphia. The lower state income tax and slightly better national cost-of-living index often make a $100k salary feel more powerful here.

The Housing Market: Buy, Rent, or Bust?

Philadelphia:

• Buy vs. Rent: The market is competitive but accessible. The median home price of $270,375 is relatively sane for a major East Coast city. You can find row homes in emerging neighborhoods or more space in the outer suburbs. It's a Balanced Market, leaning slightly toward buyers in some areas and sellers in others.
• Availability: Inventory is tight but not frozen. You can buy a home here without the bidding wars seen in Boston or NYC, but desirable properties move fast.

Waukegan:

• Buy vs. Rent: Similar median home price ($248,000) but with a key difference: you're likely getting more land and a single-family home for that price compared to Philadelphia's row-house-centric market. The Housing Index of 110.7 is lower, signaling slightly more affordability.
• Availability: It’s a Buyer's Market. Inventory is higher, and competition is lower than in Chicago proper. You have more negotiating power as a buyer, which is a huge plus.

Verdict:

• Winner for Homebuyers: Waukegan. Lower prices, a buyer's market, and more space for your dollar.
• Winner for Renters: Philadelphia. A wider variety of rental stock in diverse neighborhoods, though prices are steeper.

The Dealbreakers: Quality of Life Under the Microscope

Traffic & Commute

• Philadelphia: Public transit (SEPTA) is extensive and usable. Commuting within the city is possible without a car. However, if you drive, I-95, I-76, and the Schuylkill Expressway are notoriously congested. A 15-mile commute can easily take 45+ minutes.
• Waukegan: You need a car. Period. Public transit exists but is limited. The commute to Chicago is a major factor: it’s about 60 miles. By car on I-94, it can range from 75 minutes (optimal) to 2+ hours (rush hour). This is a massive daily time commitment.

Weather

• Philadelphia (Average: 52°F): Experiences all four seasons. Winters are cold with snow (avg. 13"), summers are hot and humid (avg. high of 87°F). Spring and fall are glorious. The humidity in July can be a real slog.
• Waukegan (Average: 18°F): Winters are brutal. The average temperature is 18°F, with heavy snowfall off Lake Michigan (avg. 40" or more). Summers are warm but less humid than Philadelphia. The key here is the Lake Effect—it can be sunny in Chicago but a snowy blizzard in Waukegan. It's a serious, long winter.

Crime & Safety

• Philadelphia (Violent Crime: 726.5/100k): This is a significant concern. Philadelphia's violent crime rate is high—nearly double the national average. Crime is highly neighborhood-specific; some areas are perfectly safe, while others are dangerous. You must do your homework on specific blocks.
• Waukegan (Violent Crime: 425.6/100k): Also above the national average, but notably lower than Philadelphia. It's a mid-sized city with urban challenges, but feels generally safer, especially in residential neighborhoods. The difference is stark: you're 70% more likely to be a victim of violent crime in Philadelphia than in Waukegan (based on these figures).

Verdict:

• Winner for Commute: Philadelphia (if you don't drive) or a Tie (if you do). Waukegan's Chicago commute is a major life drain.
• Winner for Weather: Philadelphia. While colder, its winters are milder than Waukegan's brutal lake-effect snow and deep freezes.
• Winner for Safety: Waukegan. The data doesn't lie—it's statistically safer.

The Final Verdict: Who Should Move Where?

After weighing the grit, the dollars, and the daily grind, here’s the decisive breakdown.

Philadelphia: The Urban Warrior's Choice

Pros:

• World-Class Culture & Food: Unbeatable museums, history, and a legendary food scene (cheesesteaks, Reading Terminal Market).
• Walkability & Transit: You can live without a car, reducing costs and stress.
• Major City Amenities: Pro sports, top-tier healthcare, and a dynamic job market.
• Lower State Income Tax: More of your paycheck stays in your pocket.
• Historic Charm: Living in a city that shaped America is a unique experience.

Cons:

• High Crime Rate: Requires street smarts and careful neighborhood selection.
• Traffic & Congestion: Driving can be a nightmare.
• Higher Cost of Living: Rent and daily expenses are steeper.
• Harsh Summers: The humidity can be oppressive.

Waukegan: The Suburban Sanctuary

Pros:

• More Affordable Housing: Get more house and land for your money.
• Buyer's Market: Less competition for homes.
• Proximity to Lake Michigan: Access to beaches, parks, and outdoor activities.
• Safer & Quieter: Lower crime rates and a slower pace of life.
• Access to Chicago: You're close enough for a day trip or a career change.

Cons:

• Brutal Winters: Long, cold, and snowy.
• Car-Dependent: You'll drive everywhere.
• Long Commute to Chicago: A major life drain if you work there.
• Less Urban Flair: Fewer cultural amenities compared to a major city.
• Higher Property Taxes: Illinois taxes can bite.

---

Winner for Families: Waukegan

For families, Waukegan takes the crown. The combination of lower housing costs, more space for a yard, and a statistically safer environment is a powerful draw. While Philadelphia has great schools in its suburbs, the city's core presents challenges that many families prefer to avoid. The slower pace and outdoor access in Waukegan are ideal for raising kids.

Winner for Singles/Young Pros: Philadelphia

Philadelphia is the clear winner for young professionals and singles. The social scene, networking opportunities, and sheer number of things to do are unmatched. You can build a career, enjoy a vibrant nightlife, and explore a deep cultural landscape—all without needing a car. The energy here is conducive to growth and connection.

Winner for Retirees: Waukegan

For retirees, Waukegan offers a more peaceful, cost-effective retirement. Lower housing costs and a quieter lifestyle are major benefits. The access to nature and the slower pace are easier on the mind and body. However, the brutal winters are a significant consideration—Philadelphia's milder winters might be preferable for those with mobility issues, but the overall cost and safety of Waukegan are hard to beat.

---

The Bottom Line:
Choose Philadelphia if you crave the energy, history, and amenities of a major city and are willing to navigate its challenges. Choose Waukegan if you want a safer, more affordable, and space-oriented lifestyle with access to nature and a major metro area (with a hefty commute). Your decision ultimately hinges on one question: Do you want to live in the action, or near it?