📊 Lifestyle Match
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Westminster and Chicago
Detailed breakdown of cost of living, income potential, and lifestyle metrics.
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Westminster and Chicago
Line-by-line data comparison.
| Category / Metric | Westminster | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Overview | ||
| Median Income | $92,101 | $74,474 |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.9% | 4.2% |
| Housing Market | ||
| Median Home Price | $514,500 | $365,000 |
| Price per SqFt | $251 | $261 |
| Monthly Rent (1BR) | $1,635 | $1,507 |
| Housing Cost Index | 146.1 | 110.7 |
| Cost of Living | ||
| Groceries Index | 101.3 | 103.3 |
| Gas Price (Gallon) | $2.26 | $3.40 |
| Safety & Lifestyle | ||
| Violent Crime (per 100k) | 289.0 | 819.0 |
| Bachelor's Degree+ | 47.2% | 45.7% |
| Air Quality (AQI) | 33 | 38 |
AI-generated analysis based on current data.
So, you're standing at a crossroads. On one side, you have the Windy City—a massive, gritty, world-class metropolis with deep history and an electric pulse. On the other, Westminster—a sprawling, affluent suburb of Denver, offering a quieter, more modern, and family-friendly lifestyle. It’s the classic big-city hustle versus the high-quality suburban grind.
Choosing between these two isn't just about picking a dot on a map; it's about picking a lifestyle. Are you chasing the career highs and cultural depth of a global hub? Or are you prioritizing safety, space, and that famous Colorado sunshine? Let's cut through the noise and break it down, dollar for dollar, degree by degree.
Chicago is a heavyweight contender. It’s a city that commands respect. With a population of 2.6 million, it’s a bustling ecosystem of distinct neighborhoods, from the luxury high-rises of the Gold Coast to the historic brownstones of Lincoln Park. The culture here is rich, unapologetic, and deeply rooted. You're trading the wide-open spaces for a walkable, world-class city where the arts, food, and nightlife scene is arguably unmatched in the Midwest. It’s for the career-driven professional, the culture vulture, and anyone who thrives on the energy of a city that never truly sleeps (though it does wind down earlier than NYC).
Westminster, with its 114,882 residents, is a different beast. It’s a quintessential modern American suburb, part of the Denver-Aurora-Lakewood metro area. The vibe is clean, planned, and active. Think sprawling parks, new construction homes, and easy access to the Rocky Mountains. It’s less about gritty street culture and more about weekend hikes, farmers' markets, and a strong sense of community safety. This city is tailor-made for families seeking top-tier schools, young professionals who work remotely or commute to Denver, and anyone who wants the amenities of a city without the overwhelming density.
Verdict: If you crave the soul and scale of a major metropolis, Chicago wins the vibe check. If you prefer a cleaner, quieter, and more nature-oriented lifestyle, Westminster is your spot.
This is where the rubber meets the road. You might earn more in Westminster, but the cost of living eats into that salary. Let's look at the raw numbers.
| Category | Chicago | Westminster | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Home Price | $365,000 | $514,500 | Chicago |
| Rent (1BR) | $1,507 | $1,635 | Chicago |
| Housing Index | 110.7 | 146.1 | Chicago |
| Median Income | $74,474 | $92,101 | Westminster |
Salary Wars & Purchasing Power:
At first glance, Westminster looks wealthier. The median income is nearly $18,000 higher. But the housing index tells a brutal story. Westminster's index is 146.1, meaning housing costs are 46% above the national average. Chicago’s index is 110.7—still pricey, but significantly more manageable.
Let's do a real-world test. If you earn the median income in both cities:
Tax Twist: This is a critical, often overlooked factor. Illinois has a flat state income tax of 4.95%. Colorado has a flat state income tax of 4.4%. Slight edge to Colorado, but it's not a game-changer. The bigger difference is property taxes, which are notoriously high in Illinois, often eating into the "cheaper home" advantage in Chicago.
Verdict: For pure purchasing power and housing affordability, Chicago is the clear winner. You get a major city for a lower cost. Westminster offers higher salaries but demands a much larger chunk of your paycheck for a place to live.
Chicago: A Buyer's Market with Caveats
The median home price of $365,000 is accessible for a major metro. You can find condos, townhomes, and single-family homes in a vast range of neighborhoods. The market is competitive but not cutthroat. Renters have plenty of options, though the best units go fast. The big advantage here is diversity of choice—you can live in a historic building, a modern loft, or a classic bungalow.
Westminster: A Seller's Market with a Premium
With a median home price of $514,500, Westminster is a premium market. You're paying for newer construction, better schools, and lower crime rates. The inventory is tighter, and the competition for desirable family homes is fierce. Renting isn't much cheaper; you're still paying a premium for the location and amenities. This is a market where you need a solid budget and patience.
Verdict: For renters, Chicago offers more variety and better value. For buyers, it depends on your budget. If you have $500k+ to spend and want a move-in ready suburban home, Westminster is your target. If you want more house for your money and are open to city living, Chicago is the smarter play.
This is where the data gets personal.
Traffic & Commute:
Weather: The Big Divider
Crime & Safety: The Hard Truth
Verdict: For weather and safety, Westminster is the undisputed champion. For commute flexibility (if you use transit), Chicago can be better, but the overall stress of city living is higher.
After dissecting the data and the lifestyle, here’s the final breakdown.
🏆 Winner for Families:
Westminster. The combination of lower crime rates, highly-rated schools, newer infrastructure, and family-oriented amenities (parks, community centers) makes it a no-brainer. The higher housing cost is the price of admission for a safer, more stable environment.
🏆 Winner for Singles/Young Pros:
Chicago. If you're in your 20s or early 30s and want to build a career, network, and have an active social life, Chicago’s density and cultural offerings are unbeatable. The lower cost of living allows for a car, a decent apartment, and a vibrant social life on a median salary.
🏆 Winner for Retirees:
Westminster. The mild(er) winters, sunshine, and lower crime rate are huge factors for retirees. Access to outdoor activities is excellent. While Chicago has great cultural institutions, the harsh weather and urban stresses can be challenging for older adults.
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
The Bottom Line:
If your heart beats for the energy, history, and cultural depth of a world-class city and you can handle the cold and the grit, Chicago offers an incredible bang for your buck. If your priorities are safety, sunshine, space, and a modern, family-focused lifestyle—and you have the budget to match—Westminster is the clear choice.