📊 Lifestyle Match
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Wyoming and Philadelphia
Detailed breakdown of cost of living, income potential, and lifestyle metrics.
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Wyoming and Philadelphia
Line-by-line data comparison.
| Category / Metric | Wyoming | Philadelphia |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Overview | ||
| Median Income | $73,950 | $60,302 |
| Unemployment Rate | 5% | 4.7% |
| Housing Market | ||
| Median Home Price | $270,000 | $270,375 |
| Price per SqFt | $206 | $204 |
| Monthly Rent (1BR) | $1,142 | $1,451 |
| Housing Cost Index | 90.8 | 117.8 |
| Cost of Living | ||
| Groceries Index | 93.3 | 100.3 |
| Gas Price (Gallon) | $3.40 | $3.40 |
| Safety & Lifestyle | ||
| Violent Crime (per 100k) | 449.2 | 726.5 |
| Bachelor's Degree+ | 29.7% | 35.7% |
| Air Quality (AQI) | 35 | 40 |
AI-generated analysis based on current data.
So, you’re standing at a crossroads. On one side, you have Philadelphia—the gritty, historic, big-city behemoth of the Northeast. On the other, you have Wyoming—the sprawling, rugged, wide-open state where the sky feels bigger and the crowds vanish. It’s not a fair fight, is it? It’s like comparing a roaring subway car to a solitary pickup truck. But for the right person, each offers a unique slice of the American dream.
Let’s cut through the noise. Whether you’re chasing career opportunities, a slower pace of life, or just a place where your paycheck stretches further, this breakdown is for you. Grab a coffee (or a beer), and let’s dive into the data and the vibe to see which one wins your heart—and your wallet.
Philadelphia is a city with a chip on its shoulder and a heart of gold. It’s the underdog of the Northeast, living in the shadow of New York and D.C. but fiercely proud of its own identity. Think world-class museums, legendary cheesesteaks, rowhouses packed with history, and a no-nonsense attitude. It’s a city of neighborhoods, from the polished Center City to the artsy Fishtown and the historic charm of Old City. The energy is palpable—fast-paced, diverse, and unapologetically urban. It’s for the hustler, the history buff, the foodie, and anyone who thrives on the buzz of a million people and the convenience of 24/7 options.
Wyoming, on the other hand, is the definition of “big sky country.” It’s a state, not a city comparison point, but its personality is defined by its vast emptiness and natural majesty. With a population of just 77,452 (smaller than many Philadelphia neighborhoods), life here moves at the speed of nature. You trade skyscrapers for mountain ranges, traffic jams for open highways, and the sound of sirens for the howl of the wind. It’s a haven for outdoor enthusiasts, self-reliant individuals, and those seeking solitude. The vibe is rugged, independent, and deeply connected to the land. It’s for the adventurer, the remote worker craving quiet, the retiree looking for peace, and anyone who finds peace in a landscape that stretches to the horizon.
Verdict:
This is where the rubber meets the road. Let’s talk cold, hard cash. We’ll use a baseline of $100,000 in annual salary to see your purchasing power.
First, the sticker shock: Philadelphia’s median income is $60,302, while Wyoming’s is higher at $73,950. But income is only half the story. The real question is, what can that money buy?
| Category | Philadelphia (1BR) | Wyoming (State Avg) | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rent | $1,451 | $1,142 | Wyoming |
| Utilities | ~$150 (higher winter heating) | ~$120 (lower, but heating is critical) | Wyoming |
| Groceries | ~15% above national avg | ~5% above national avg | Wyoming |
| Housing Index | 117.8 (17.8% above avg) | 90.8 (9.2% below avg) | Wyoming |
Salary Wars: The $100k Test
In Philadelphia, earning $100,000 feels like a solid middle-class existence. After taxes (PA has a flat 3.07% state income tax, plus city wage tax of ~3.8%), you’re taking home roughly $72,000. Your biggest expense is housing. A $1,451 rent leaves you with a decent buffer, but buying a median home for $270,375 is a stretch on a single $100k salary without a hefty down payment. Your purchasing power is good for city living, but you’re not living lavishly.
In Wyoming, the picture changes. There’s no state income tax. That’s a massive win. On $100,000, you take home closer to $77,000 (federal taxes only). Your rent is $1,142, giving you an extra $300/month in your pocket compared to Philly. The median home price is virtually identical ($270,000), but the lack of state income tax and lower overall costs mean your dollar stretches significantly further. You could afford a similar home with more ease, or save/invest more aggressively.
Insight: Wyoming’s lack of state income tax is a game-changer, especially for higher earners. Philadelphia’s cost of living is reasonable for a major Northeast city, but Wyoming offers more financial breathing room.
Verdict: Wyoming wins on pure purchasing power. Your $100k feels like $105k in Wyoming due to no state income tax and lower costs.
Philadelphia:
Wyoming:
Verdict: It’s a tie, but for different reasons. Philadelphia offers more rental options and a slightly easier entry into buying for city dwellers. Wyoming offers more space for your money but with less inventory and potential for market volatility in tourist-heavy areas.
This is where personal preference truly takes over.
Traffic & Commute:
Weather:
Crime & Safety:
Verdict:
There’s no one-size-fits-all answer, but the data points to clear winners for specific lifestyles.
Why? While Wyoming’s safety and space are appealing, Philadelphia wins on practicality and opportunity. You have access to a wider variety of public and private schools, more diverse neighborhoods to choose from, and infinitely more cultural and recreational activities for kids (museums, zoos, parks, sports). The job market is more robust and diverse, providing stability. The median home price is attainable, and you’re in a major metro with everything you need within reach. The trade-off is the higher crime rate, which requires careful neighborhood selection.
Why? Career growth, networking, and social life. Philadelphia’s economy is powered by education (UPenn, Drexel), healthcare, and tech. For a young professional, the opportunities for advancement, networking events, and a vibrant social scene (bars, restaurants, concerts) are unmatched. You can build a career and a social circle in a city that’s affordable compared to NYC or Boston. Wyoming’s social scene is extremely limited; you’d need to be a remote worker who is perfectly happy with solitude.
Why? Peace, nature, and financial relief. For retirees on a fixed income, the lack of state income tax and lower overall cost of living is a massive advantage. The pace of life is slow, the air is clean, and the scenery is breathtaking. If you love fishing, hiking, hunting, and wide-open spaces, Wyoming is paradise. The trade-off is the harsh winters and potential healthcare access challenges in remote areas (you’d likely need to travel to larger cities like Cheyenne or out of state for specialized care).
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
Final Word: Choose Philadelphia if you’re seeking career growth, urban energy, and cultural depth, and you can handle the cost and city challenges. Choose Wyoming if your priority is space, nature, financial freedom, and a slower pace, and you’re built to withstand its rugged climate.