📊 Lifestyle Match
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Auburn and Chicago
Detailed breakdown of cost of living, income potential, and lifestyle metrics.
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Auburn and Chicago
Line-by-line data comparison.
| Category / Metric | Auburn | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Overview | ||
| Median Income | $92,824 | $74,474 |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6% | 4.2% |
| Housing Market | ||
| Median Home Price | $635,000 | $365,000 |
| Price per SqFt | $303 | $261 |
| Monthly Rent (1BR) | $1,864 | $1,507 |
| Housing Cost Index | 151.5 | 110.7 |
| Cost of Living | ||
| Groceries Index | 107.9 | 103.3 |
| Gas Price (Gallon) | $3.65 | $3.40 |
| Safety & Lifestyle | ||
| Violent Crime (per 100k) | 372.1 | 819.0 |
| Bachelor's Degree+ | 26.2% | 45.7% |
| Air Quality (AQI) | 63 | 38 |
AI-generated analysis based on current data.
Here is the ultimate head-to-head showdown between Chicago and Auburn.
So, you’re standing at a crossroads. On one side, you have the Windy City—a sprawling, gritty, world-class metropolis that never sleeps. On the other, you have Auburn—a smaller, likely more tranquil city (based on the data, we’re assuming this is Auburn, Alabama, given the population and weather stats, rather than Auburn, Washington). This isn't just about picking a zip code; it's about choosing a lifestyle.
Are you chasing the electric hum of the city, the career opportunities that come with 2.6 million neighbors, and the culture of a global hub? Or are you looking for a slower pace, lower crime stats, and a break from the brutal Midwest winters?
Let’s break it down, stat by stat, vibe by vibe.
Chicago is the heavyweight champion of the Midwest. It’s a city of distinct neighborhoods, world-class museums, deep-dish pizza, and lakefront views that rival any coastal city. The culture here is hustle-hard, play-hard. It’s for the career-driven professional who wants to grab a drink after work in the Loop, catch a Cubs game on the weekend, and never run out of new restaurants to try. However, make no mistake: the "City of Big Shoulders" has a grit to it. It’s loud, it’s busy, and the winters are no joke.
Auburn (assuming the Alabama location based on the population and weather data) offers a completely different flavor. With a population of just under 85,000, it’s a college town (home to Auburn University) with a strong sense of community and Southern hospitality. The vibe here is laid-back, family-oriented, and significantly quieter. It’s for those who prefer tailgates over subway rides, and who want to feel the sun on their skin more often than they shovel snow. It’s a place where the pace of life slows down, and community ties run deep.
Who is it for?
This is where the "sticker shock" often hits. It’s not just about how much you earn, but what that money actually buys you. Let’s look at the raw numbers, but remember the secret ingredient: taxes. Illinois has a flat state income tax of 4.95%, while Alabama has a progressive income tax that tops out at 5% (though the brackets are structured differently). For high earners, Illinois can be slightly more favorable, but for the average earner, Alabama might come out ahead.
Here’s a breakdown of the cost of living essentials:
| Category | Chicago | Auburn | The Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Income | $74,474 | $92,824 | Auburn wins by $18,350 |
| Rent (1BR) | $1,507 | $1,864 | Auburn is $357 more per month |
| Housing Index | 110.7 | 151.5 | Auburn is 41 points higher (more expensive) |
| Violent Crime/100k | 819.0 | 372.1 | Auburn is 55% safer |
The Salary Wars & Purchasing Power
At first glance, Auburn looks like the winner with a median income of $92,824 compared to Chicago’s $74,474. That’s a 25% higher median income. However, the "Housing Index" tells a different story. A score of 151.5 for Auburn indicates a cost of living that is significantly higher than the national average, driven largely by housing.
While Auburn pays more, it costs more to live there—specifically in housing. In Chicago, you might earn less, but the rent is surprisingly manageable compared to other major metros, and the housing index is closer to the national average.
Verdict on Purchasing Power: If you earn the median income in both cities, your dollar goes further in Chicago regarding housing costs, but you’ll pay more in property taxes and state income tax. However, for high earners (over $100k), the math might shift. Auburn’s higher median income suggests a stronger job market for certain sectors (likely tech, engineering, and education tied to the university), but the cost of living eats into that advantage. Chicago offers better "bang for your buck" for renters and those looking to enter the housing market at a lower entry price.
Chicago:
The Chicago market is competitive but diverse. With a median home price of $365,000, it is one of the more affordable major cities in the U.S. The inventory is vast—you can find a condo in the Loop, a bungalow in the suburbs, or a historic brownstone in Lincoln Park. It’s currently a balanced market, leaning slightly toward buyers in certain neighborhoods. Renting is a viable long-term option here, with plenty of stock.
Auburn:
Auburn is a different beast. The median home price is a staggering $635,000—that’s 74% higher than Chicago. This suggests a constrained supply. College towns often have strict zoning laws and limited space for expansion, driving prices up. The Housing Index of 151.5 confirms this: it is a seller's market with high demand and low inventory. If you’re looking to buy, be prepared for bidding wars and high prices. Renting isn’t much of a reprieve, with a 1BR costing $1,864—higher than Chicago’s $1,507.
Verdict: For affordability and variety, Chicago takes the win. Auburn’s housing market is surprisingly expensive for a city of its size, likely driven by the university and limited inventory.
This is where personal preference meets hard data.
Weather:
Traffic & Commute:
Crime & Safety:
Verdict on Dealbreakers:
Choosing between Chicago and Auburn requires you to prioritize what matters most. Is it culture and opportunity, or safety and sunshine?
Why: The safety stats alone are a game-changer. A violent crime rate of 372.1 per 100k vs. Chicago’s 819.0 is a massive difference. Combined with the mild weather, excellent public schools (tied to the university), and a strong community feel, Auburn provides a nurturing environment for raising kids. The downside? The high housing costs, but for many families, safety trumps price.
Why: Despite the lower median income, Chicago offers a world of opportunities for career growth, networking, and social life that a town of 85,000 simply cannot match. The cost of entry for housing (renting) is actually lower than Auburn, leaving more disposable income for enjoying the city’s endless entertainment. The nightlife, dining, and cultural scene are unbeatable.
Why: If you’re looking to retire, the combination of mild winters, lower crime, and a slower pace of life is ideal. You avoid the brutal Chicago winters and the high-stress environment of a major city. The community is welcoming, and while the cost of living is high, the quality of life for seniors is excellent.
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
The Bottom Line:
If you want a vibrant, diverse, and affordable (relatively) urban experience and can handle the cold and crime stats, Chicago is your city. If you prioritize safety, community, and sunshine and are willing to pay a premium for housing, Auburn is the better fit. Choose wisely.