📊 Lifestyle Match
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Austin and San Francisco
Detailed breakdown of cost of living, income potential, and lifestyle metrics.
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Austin and San Francisco
Line-by-line data comparison.
| Category / Metric | Austin | San Francisco |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Overview | ||
| Median Income | $91,501 | $126,730 |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.8% | 4.6% |
| Housing Market | ||
| Median Home Price | $520,000 | $1,400,000 |
| Price per SqFt | $306 | $972 |
| Monthly Rent (1BR) | $821 | $2,818 |
| Housing Cost Index | 126.4 | 200.2 |
| Cost of Living | ||
| Groceries Index | 91.9 | 117.2 |
| Gas Price (Gallon) | $2.35 | $3.98 |
| Safety & Lifestyle | ||
| Violent Crime (per 100k) | 399.5 | 541.0 |
| Bachelor's Degree+ | 61.7% | 60.4% |
| Air Quality (AQI) | 41 | 35 |
AI-generated analysis based on current data.
Here is the ultimate head-to-head showdown between Austin and San Francisco.
So, you’re standing at a crossroads. On one side, you have the "City by the Bay"—a global icon of tech, culture, and steep hills. On the other, you have the "Live Music Capital of the World"—a booming hub of southern hospitality, brisket, and silicon chips.
Choosing between Austin and San Francisco isn't just about picking a zip code; it's about choosing a lifestyle. Are you chasing that high-octane career with a side of foggy mystique, or are you looking for a little more breathing room and a backyard that doesn’t require a second mortgage?
Let’s cut through the noise. Grab your coffee (or your Shiner Bock), and let’s dive into the data.
San Francisco is the cool, sophisticated older sibling who went to an Ivy League school. It is dense, walkable, and culturally rich. You’re trading square footage for world-class museums, Michelin-starred dining, and a history that shaped the modern world. The vibe is fast-paced, cerebral, and yes, expensive. It attracts the ambitious, the artist, and the tech elite.
Austin is the younger, scrappier sibling who dropped out of college to start a band and a software company. It’s sprawling, car-dependent, and aggressively casual. The vibe is "Keep Austin Weird"—a motto that celebrates the oddball, the creative, and the entrepreneur. It’s where you go to build things, eat incredible BBQ, and enjoy the outdoors without a heavy coat.
This is where the rubber meets the road. You might earn a higher salary in SF, but your purchasing power tells a different story. Let’s look at the raw data.
| Metric | Austin | San Francisco | The Takeaway |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Home Price | $545,000 | $1,350,000 | SF is 147% more expensive. |
| Rent (1BR) | $821 | $2,818 | Austin rent is roughly 70% cheaper. |
| Housing Index | 105.8 | 188.5 | SF housing is nearly double the national average. |
| Median Income | $91,501 | $126,730 | SF pays more, but does it matter? |
The "Purchasing Power" Reality Check:
Let’s play a game. If you earn $100,000 in Austin, you are living a very comfortable, upper-middle-class lifestyle. You can afford a nice 1-bedroom apartment for under $1,000, save money, and still go out on the town.
If you earn $100,000 in San Francisco, you are technically below the median income for a single person. After taxes and that $2,818 rent, you are likely living paycheck to paycheck or splitting a place with roommates.
The Tax Factor:
This is the ace up Texas’s sleeve. Texas has 0% state income tax. California has a graduated income tax that can hit 13.3% for high earners. On a $126,000 salary in SF, you are paying a fortune to the state. That massive salary bump in SF often evaporates the moment you look at your tax bill and your rent check.
Verdict: The Dollar Power Winner
Austin. By a landslide. The cost of living in San Francisco is a different universe. In Austin, your money actually buys you a life; in SF, it mostly buys you a roof.
San Francisco:
The housing market here is a bloodsport. With a Housing Index of 188.5, competition is fierce. You aren't just buying a home; you're buying a status symbol. The median home price sits at a staggering $1,350,000. If you want to buy, you need deep pockets and a high tolerance for bidding wars. Most people rent, but with a median rent of $2,818, you’re paying a mortgage in someone else’s name.
Austin:
While Austin is no longer the "cheap" secret it used to be, it is still accessible compared to the Bay Area. A median home price of $545,000 means homeownership is a realistic dream for many professionals. The market is competitive—Austin is growing fast—but you aren't priced out before you even start. Renting is also a viable, affordable option if you want flexibility.
Verdict: The Housing Winner
Austin. It’s not even close. Unless you have a trust fund or a FAANG executive salary, buying a home in SF is a pipe dream for the average person. Austin offers a path to equity without requiring you to sell a kidney.
Let’s look at the Violent Crime rates per 100k people:
San Francisco has seen a significant rise in property crime and open-air drug issues in certain neighborhoods. While the tourist areas are generally safe, the stats show a higher rate of violent crime compared to Austin.
Austin remains statistically safer, though rapid growth is putting a strain on infrastructure. It’s generally considered a very safe city for its size.
Verdict: The Quality of Life Winner
Austin. It edges out SF on safety and wins big on weather if you prefer sun over fog. However, if you hate humidity and love walking to get groceries, SF takes this point.
We’ve crunched the numbers, checked the vibes, and weighed the pros and cons. Here is the final breakdown for your specific life stage.
Austin
Why? You get a yard. You get a school district that isn't overcrowded. You get a mortgage that doesn't eat 50% of your household income. The community vibe in Austin is strong, with plenty of parks and family-friendly festivals.
San Francisco (by a hair)
Why? If you are young, single, and want to network with the best in the world, SF is the place. The density creates serendipity; you bump into people. The nightlife, the restaurants, and the cultural depth are unmatched. However, if you want to save money while young, Austin is the smarter play.
Austin
Why? Lower taxes (no state income tax on pensions), warmer weather (mostly), and a slower pace of life. SF is too expensive for fixed incomes, and the hills are a literal pain to navigate.
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons: