📊 Lifestyle Match
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Farmington and Chicago
Detailed breakdown of cost of living, income potential, and lifestyle metrics.
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Farmington and Chicago
Line-by-line data comparison.
| Category / Metric | Farmington | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Overview | ||
| Median Income | $63,745 | $74,474 |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2% | 4.2% |
| Housing Market | ||
| Median Home Price | $279,000 | $365,000 |
| Price per SqFt | $178 | $261 |
| Monthly Rent (1BR) | $847 | $1,507 |
| Housing Cost Index | 57.7 | 110.7 |
| Cost of Living | ||
| Groceries Index | 95.4 | 103.3 |
| Gas Price (Gallon) | $3.40 | $3.40 |
| Safety & Lifestyle | ||
| Violent Crime (per 100k) | 778.3 | 819.0 |
| Bachelor's Degree+ | 22.8% | 45.7% |
| Air Quality (AQI) | 76 | 38 |
AI-generated analysis based on current data.
You’re standing at a crossroads, staring at two wildly different maps. On one side, you’ve got Chicago—a sprawling, world-class metropolis where the skyline pierces the clouds and the rumble of the "L" is the city’s heartbeat. On the other, Farmington—a quiet, midsize community in the Four Corners region, where the pace slows down and the views stretch out to the red rocks of the desert.
This isn’t just a choice between two cities; it’s a choice between two entire lifestyles. One is a high-stakes, high-reward game of urban chess. The other is a strategic retreat where you can actually breathe.
Let’s cut through the noise and get real about where you should plant your roots.
Chicago is the quintessential American big city. It’s loud, proud, and relentlessly energetic. We’re talking world-class museums (Art Institute, Field Museum), a food scene that rivals any on the planet (from deep-dish pizza to Michelin-starred dining), and a lakefront that feels more like an ocean. The culture is built on a deep sense of community pride, but it’s also a grind. Winters are brutally cold, the traffic is legendary, and the energy can be overwhelming. This city is for the ambitious, the social butterflies, and those who thrive on the buzz of endless possibility. If you want anonymity in a crowd of millions, you’ve found it.
Farmington is the antidote to urban chaos. Nestled in the high desert of northwestern New Mexico, it’s a hub for outdoor recreation, Navajo and Hopi culture, and a laid-back, family-friendly atmosphere. The vibe is unpretentious and community-focused. You’re closer to nature than to a skyscraper—think hiking in the Bisti/De-Na-Zin Wilderness, fishing at Navajo Lake, and exploring ancient Puebloan ruins. The pace is deliberate, the skies are wide open, and the cost of living is a breath of fresh air. This city is for those who prioritize space, tranquility, and a direct connection to the rugged beauty of the American Southwest. If your ideal Friday night involves a campfire instead of a nightclub, Farmington is calling.
This is where the rubber meets the road. Let’s talk purchasing power—the real-world value of your paycheck after the essentials are paid for. The "sticker shock" of moving from a midsize town to a major metro is very real, and the data proves it.
Here’s the cold, hard comparison of core expenses:
| Expense Category | Chicago, IL | Farmington, NM | The Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Home Price | $365,000 | $279,000 | $86,000 cheaper in Farmington |
| 1BR Rent | $1,507 | $847 | $660 cheaper in Farmington |
| Housing Index | 110.7 | 57.7 | Farmington is nearly half the cost |
| Median Income | $74,474 | $63,745 | $10,729 higher in Chicago |
Salary Wars: The Purchasing Power Play
At first glance, Chicago’s higher median income looks appealing. But let’s run the numbers. If you earn $100,000 in Chicago, your take-home pay after federal, state, and city taxes is roughly $72,000. That same $100,000 in Farmington (which has a lower state income tax) nets you closer to $76,000. You keep more of your money in Farmington.
Now, apply that to housing. In Chicago, a median-priced home costs $365,000. To afford that with a standard 20% down payment and a 30-year mortgage, you’d need an income of around $115,000. In Farmington, that same median home is $279,000. The income needed to comfortably afford it drops to about $88,000.
Verdict: You can live like a king (or at least a very comfortable homeowner) in Farmington on a salary that would have you scraping by in Chicago. Farmington wins the purchasing power battle by a landslide.
Chicago (Seller’s Market): The housing market here is competitive and dense. You’re buying into a premier location with high demand. Renting is the default for many, especially young professionals, because the down payment on a home is steep. The Housing Index of 110.7 confirms you’re paying a premium for the address. Competition is fierce, and you often have to be decisive (and flexible) to land a property. The upside? Historically, Chicago real estate has been a solid long-term investment.
Farmington (Buyer’s Market): With a Housing Index of 57.7, Farmington is a buyer’s dream. Your dollar stretches incredibly far. You can find a spacious single-family home with a yard for the price of a Chicago condo. Renting is affordable, making it easy to test the waters, but the market is geared toward ownership. There’s less competition, giving you more negotiating power. It’s a market where you can establish roots without being house-poor.
Verdict: For sheer affordability and ease of entry into homeownership, Farmington is the clear winner.
Verdict: It’s a tie on crime (don’t assume safety based on size alone). Farmington wins on commute and weather if you prefer milder winters and zero traffic stress. Chicago wins if you can’t live without four distinct seasons and don’t mind a longer commute.
After breaking down the data and the lifestyle, here’s the final call.
Winner for Families: Farmington.
Winner for Singles/Young Professionals: Chicago.
Winner for Retirees: Farmington.
Chicago
Farmington
The Bottom Line: Choose Chicago if you’re chasing career peaks, cultural immersion, and urban energy, and you have the budget to support it. Choose Farmington if you’re seeking financial freedom, space, a connection to nature, and a quieter, more deliberate way of life. It’s not a matter of which is better—it’s a matter of which is better for you.