Head-to-Head Analysis

Farmington vs Chicago

Detailed breakdown of cost of living, income potential, and lifestyle metrics.

Farmington
Candidate A

Farmington

NM
Cost Index 86.5
Median Income $64k
Rent (1BR) $847
View Full Profile
Chicago
Candidate B

Chicago

IL
Cost Index 102.6
Median Income $74k
Rent (1BR) $1507
View Full Profile

📊 Lifestyle Match

Visualizing the tradeoffs between Farmington and Chicago

📋 The Details

Line-by-line data comparison.

Category / Metric Farmington Chicago
Financial Overview
Median Income $63,745 $74,474
Unemployment Rate 4.2% 4.2%
Housing Market
Median Home Price $279,000 $365,000
Price per SqFt $178 $261
Monthly Rent (1BR) $847 $1,507
Housing Cost Index 57.7 110.7
Cost of Living
Groceries Index 95.4 103.3
Gas Price (Gallon) $3.40 $3.40
Safety & Lifestyle
Violent Crime (per 100k) 778.3 819.0
Bachelor's Degree+ 22.8% 45.7%
Air Quality (AQI) 76 38

Expert Verdict

AI-generated analysis based on current data.

You’re standing at a crossroads, staring at two wildly different maps. On one side, you’ve got Chicago—a sprawling, world-class metropolis where the skyline pierces the clouds and the rumble of the "L" is the city’s heartbeat. On the other, Farmington—a quiet, midsize community in the Four Corners region, where the pace slows down and the views stretch out to the red rocks of the desert.

This isn’t just a choice between two cities; it’s a choice between two entire lifestyles. One is a high-stakes, high-reward game of urban chess. The other is a strategic retreat where you can actually breathe.

Let’s cut through the noise and get real about where you should plant your roots.

The Vibe Check: Big City Dreams vs. Desert Oasis

Chicago is the quintessential American big city. It’s loud, proud, and relentlessly energetic. We’re talking world-class museums (Art Institute, Field Museum), a food scene that rivals any on the planet (from deep-dish pizza to Michelin-starred dining), and a lakefront that feels more like an ocean. The culture is built on a deep sense of community pride, but it’s also a grind. Winters are brutally cold, the traffic is legendary, and the energy can be overwhelming. This city is for the ambitious, the social butterflies, and those who thrive on the buzz of endless possibility. If you want anonymity in a crowd of millions, you’ve found it.

Farmington is the antidote to urban chaos. Nestled in the high desert of northwestern New Mexico, it’s a hub for outdoor recreation, Navajo and Hopi culture, and a laid-back, family-friendly atmosphere. The vibe is unpretentious and community-focused. You’re closer to nature than to a skyscraper—think hiking in the Bisti/De-Na-Zin Wilderness, fishing at Navajo Lake, and exploring ancient Puebloan ruins. The pace is deliberate, the skies are wide open, and the cost of living is a breath of fresh air. This city is for those who prioritize space, tranquility, and a direct connection to the rugged beauty of the American Southwest. If your ideal Friday night involves a campfire instead of a nightclub, Farmington is calling.

The Dollar Power: Where Does Your Salary Actually Go?

This is where the rubber meets the road. Let’s talk purchasing power—the real-world value of your paycheck after the essentials are paid for. The "sticker shock" of moving from a midsize town to a major metro is very real, and the data proves it.

Here’s the cold, hard comparison of core expenses:

Expense Category Chicago, IL Farmington, NM The Difference
Median Home Price $365,000 $279,000 $86,000 cheaper in Farmington
1BR Rent $1,507 $847 $660 cheaper in Farmington
Housing Index 110.7 57.7 Farmington is nearly half the cost
Median Income $74,474 $63,745 $10,729 higher in Chicago

Salary Wars: The Purchasing Power Play
At first glance, Chicago’s higher median income looks appealing. But let’s run the numbers. If you earn $100,000 in Chicago, your take-home pay after federal, state, and city taxes is roughly $72,000. That same $100,000 in Farmington (which has a lower state income tax) nets you closer to $76,000. You keep more of your money in Farmington.

Now, apply that to housing. In Chicago, a median-priced home costs $365,000. To afford that with a standard 20% down payment and a 30-year mortgage, you’d need an income of around $115,000. In Farmington, that same median home is $279,000. The income needed to comfortably afford it drops to about $88,000.

Verdict: You can live like a king (or at least a very comfortable homeowner) in Farmington on a salary that would have you scraping by in Chicago. Farmington wins the purchasing power battle by a landslide.

The Housing Market: Buy, Rent, or Get Out?

Chicago (Seller’s Market): The housing market here is competitive and dense. You’re buying into a premier location with high demand. Renting is the default for many, especially young professionals, because the down payment on a home is steep. The Housing Index of 110.7 confirms you’re paying a premium for the address. Competition is fierce, and you often have to be decisive (and flexible) to land a property. The upside? Historically, Chicago real estate has been a solid long-term investment.

Farmington (Buyer’s Market): With a Housing Index of 57.7, Farmington is a buyer’s dream. Your dollar stretches incredibly far. You can find a spacious single-family home with a yard for the price of a Chicago condo. Renting is affordable, making it easy to test the waters, but the market is geared toward ownership. There’s less competition, giving you more negotiating power. It’s a market where you can establish roots without being house-poor.

Verdict: For sheer affordability and ease of entry into homeownership, Farmington is the clear winner.

The Dealbreakers: Quality of Life Showdown

Traffic & Commute

  • Chicago: Brutal. Commutes can easily hit 45-60 minutes each way, and parking is a nightmare (and expensive). The public transit system (CTA and Metra) is extensive and a lifesaver, but it’s crowded and subject to delays.
  • Farmington: A non-issue. The average commute is under 20 minutes. Traffic is light, and parking is free and plentiful. The city is designed for cars, and you’re rarely more than a 10-minute drive from anything you need.

Weather

  • Chicago: This is a major dealbreaker for many. Winters are long, dark, and punishing. The average January low is a bone-chilling 21°F, with heavy snow and bitter wind chills off Lake Michigan. Summers are hot and humid (90°F+). You need a serious wardrobe for all four seasons.
  • Farmington: High-desert climate. Winters are cold but sunny, with an average low of 43°F. You get snow, but it’s often light and melts quickly. Summers are warm and dry, not oppressively humid. The sunshine is abundant year-round.

Crime & Safety

  • Chicago: The data shows a Violent Crime rate of 819.0/100k. However, this is highly concentrated in specific neighborhoods. Many of the city’s trendy, affluent areas (like Lincoln Park, Lakeview) have crime rates comparable to or lower than the national average. The key is neighborhood research.
  • Farmington: Surprisingly, the data shows a Violent Crime rate of 778.3/100k, which is very close to Chicago’s. This can be a shock to those assuming a small town is automatically safer. Like any city, safety varies by neighborhood. The perception of safety is often higher due to the tight-knit community and slower pace, but the statistics demand a nuanced look.

Verdict: It’s a tie on crime (don’t assume safety based on size alone). Farmington wins on commute and weather if you prefer milder winters and zero traffic stress. Chicago wins if you can’t live without four distinct seasons and don’t mind a longer commute.

The Verdict: Who Should Move Where?

After breaking down the data and the lifestyle, here’s the final call.

  • Winner for Families: Farmington.

    • Why: The combination of affordable housing, lower cost of living, and a slower pace is a huge draw. You can get a bigger home with a yard for far less money. The community is family-oriented, with plenty of outdoor activities. While Chicago has excellent schools in certain suburbs, the overall financial and lifestyle pressure is significantly higher.
  • Winner for Singles/Young Professionals: Chicago.

    • Why: Career opportunities are unmatched. The networking, social, and dating scenes are vibrant and endless. The cultural amenities and nightlife are world-class. While the cost is high, the energy and potential for professional growth are what many young people seek. Farmington’s social scene would likely feel limiting.
  • Winner for Retirees: Farmington.

    • Why: Stretching your retirement savings is critical. The dramatically lower cost of living, especially for housing, means your nest egg goes much further. The mild winter sun is easier on the body than Chicago’s deep freeze, and the relaxed pace is ideal for enjoying retirement. The sense of community is strong, combating the isolation that can sometimes occur in retirement.

Final Pros & Cons

Chicago

  • Pros: World-class culture & dining, massive job market, vibrant social scene, extensive public transit, iconic lakefront, four distinct seasons.
  • Cons: Extremely high cost of living (especially housing), brutal winters, long commutes, high taxes, concentrated crime in certain areas, competitive housing market.

Farmington

  • Pros: Exceptionally low cost of living, affordable homeownership, minimal traffic, abundant sunshine and outdoor recreation, family-friendly community, slower pace of life.
  • Cons: Limited job market (especially for white-collar/tech), fewer cultural amenities, very isolated (far from major metros), surprisingly high crime rate relative to size, limited dining/nightlife options.

The Bottom Line: Choose Chicago if you’re chasing career peaks, cultural immersion, and urban energy, and you have the budget to support it. Choose Farmington if you’re seeking financial freedom, space, a connection to nature, and a quieter, more deliberate way of life. It’s not a matter of which is better—it’s a matter of which is better for you.