📊 Lifestyle Match
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Glasgow CDP and Chicago
Detailed breakdown of cost of living, income potential, and lifestyle metrics.
Visualizing the tradeoffs between Glasgow CDP and Chicago
Line-by-line data comparison.
| Category / Metric | Glasgow CDP | Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| Financial Overview | ||
| Median Income | $109,803 | $74,474 |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9% | 4.2% |
| Housing Market | ||
| Median Home Price | $346,200 | $365,000 |
| Price per SqFt | $null | $261 |
| Monthly Rent (1BR) | $1,242 | $1,507 |
| Housing Cost Index | 117.8 | 110.7 |
| Cost of Living | ||
| Groceries Index | 100.3 | 103.3 |
| Gas Price (Gallon) | $3.40 | $3.40 |
| Safety & Lifestyle | ||
| Violent Crime (per 100k) | 431.5 | 819.0 |
| Bachelor's Degree+ | 35.4% | 45.7% |
| Air Quality (AQI) | 25 | 38 |
AI-generated analysis based on current data.
So, you're standing at a crossroads. On one side, you have Chicago, the Windy City—a sprawling, world-class metropolis with deep-dish pizza, iconic architecture, and a pulse that never quits. On the other, you have Glasgow CDP, a smaller, more intimate community (likely in the Pittsburgh area) that offers a quieter, perhaps more financially savvy lifestyle. It’s a classic David vs. Goliath matchup, but the right choice depends entirely on what you’re looking for.
Let's cut through the noise and break down this showdown with real data, honest insights, and a little bit of opinionated advice. Grab your coffee; we’re diving in.
Chicago is a beast. It’s the third-largest city in the U.S., and it feels like it. The culture here is fast-paced, diverse, and unapologetically gritty. You’re talking about a city with 2.6 million people, world-class museums, a legendary food scene, and neighborhoods that each have their own distinct personality. It’s for the person who craves energy, anonymity, and the feeling that they’re in the center of the universe. If your ideal Friday night involves a Cubs game, a deep-dish feast, and a late-night jazz club, Chicago is calling your name.
Glasgow CDP, on the other hand, is a different beast entirely. With a population of just 16,095, it’s a tight-knit community. The vibe is likely more suburban, quieter, and family-oriented. This isn’t a place where you’ll find a bustling nightlife or endless cultural events. It’s for the person who values space, community bonds, and a slower pace of life. It’s the perfect setting for raising a family, enjoying your backyard, and knowing your neighbors by name.
Who is each city for?
This is where things get interesting. At first glance, Glasgow CDP’s median income of $109,803 looks like it crushes Chicago’s $74,474. But income is only half the story. The real question is purchasing power—how far does your dollar actually stretch?
Let’s look at the hard numbers for everyday expenses. We’ll compare the cost of living based on the data provided.
| Expense Category | Chicago | Glasgow CDP | The Lowdown |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median Home Price | $365,000 | $346,200 | Surprisingly close, with Glasgow actually being slightly cheaper. |
| Rent (1BR) | $1,507 | $1,242 | Glasgow offers a ~17.5% savings on rent. |
| Housing Index | 110.7 | 117.8 | This is a relative index where 100 is the national average. Glasgow is ~6.4% more expensive in housing costs relative to the national average. |
| Utilities | Data Not Provided | Data Not Provided | We'll assume utilities are comparable or slightly cheaper in Glasgow due to its smaller size. |
| Groceries | Data Not Provided | Data Not Provided | Typically, groceries are cheaper in smaller markets, giving Glasgow a slight edge. |
Salary Wars & Purchasing Power:
If you earned $100,000 in Chicago, your take-home pay after federal, state (Illinois flat tax of 4.95%), and local taxes would be roughly $72,000. In Glasgow CDP (assuming it's in a state with similar tax structures like Pennsylvania, which has a flat 3.07% income tax), your take-home on $100,000 would be closer to $76,000. That’s an extra $4,000 in your pocket annually.
Now, combine that higher take-home with cheaper rent. In Chicago, you’d spend about $18,084 on rent annually. In Glasgow, you’d spend $14,904. That’s a savings of $3,180 just on housing. Suddenly, that $100,000 salary in Glasgow feels like it has significantly more muscle.
The Verdict on Dollar Power: While Chicago’s median income is lower, its cost of living, especially in housing, is also lower than many major metros. However, Glasgow CDP’s combination of a higher median income and lower rent gives it a clear edge in pure purchasing power. Your dollar simply works harder in Glasgow.
CALLOUT BOX: Dollar Power Winner
Glasgow CDP wins this round. The higher median income and lower rent mean you can save more or afford a larger home for the same cost. It’s a better bang for your buck.
Chicago’s Housing Market:
With a median home price of $365,000, Chicago is surprisingly affordable for a city of its stature. However, the market is fierce. It’s a mixed bag—some neighborhoods are fiercely competitive seller’s markets, while others offer more inventory. Renting is a popular option, and the $1,507 1BR rent is reasonable for a major metro. The key here is location, location, location. Your money buys you access to a world-class city, but you’ll pay for it in property taxes and potentially less square footage.
Glasgow CDP’s Housing Market:
The median home price of $346,200 is slightly lower than Chicago’s, but the Housing Index of 117.8 tells us it’s more expensive relative to the national average than Chicago (110.7). This suggests a competitive, seller-friendly market. With a smaller population, inventory is likely lower, meaning homes may sell quickly. Renting is cheaper at $1,242, offering a lower barrier to entry. For buyers, this market might require patience and a willingness to move fast.
Availability & Competition:
Chicago: Notorious for traffic. The "L" (elevated train) and bus system are extensive, but commuting can still be a grind. Average commute times are 30-45 minutes for many. The cost of parking downtown can be astronomical.
Glasgow CDP: As a small community, traffic is likely minimal. Commutes are shorter, and you can probably get anywhere in town in under 10 minutes. The big win here is time—time you get back in your day.
Chicago: 21.0°F is the average January low, but that doesn't capture the brutal reality. Winters are long, gray, and windy, with significant snowfall. Summers are hot and humid, often hitting the 90°F mark. It’s a city of extremes.
Glasgow CDP: 54.0°F likely represents a milder average, perhaps a coastal or temperate climate. Winters are presumably less severe, summers less oppressive. This is a massive quality-of-life factor for many.
This is a critical, emotionally charged category. We must be honest with the data.
The Verdict on Safety: Glasgow CDP is statistically safer than Chicago. However, safety in Chicago is highly neighborhood-dependent. You can find very safe neighborhoods, but the city-wide average is a stark reality check.
CALLOUT BOX: Quality of Life Winner
Glasgow CDP wins decisively. Better weather, less traffic, and lower crime rates (though still above average) make for a more relaxed and predictable daily experience.
After weighing the data, the culture, and the quality-of-life factors, here’s my head-to-head verdict.
For raising a family, Glasgow CDP takes the crown. The lower crime rate, shorter commutes, milder weather, and stronger purchasing power mean you can afford a larger home in a safer environment. The tight-knit community is ideal for kids. Chicago’s public school system has gems, but it’s a complex landscape, and the city’s challenges (crime, traffic) can be overwhelming for parents.
No contest here. If you’re young, ambitious, and hungry for experience, Chicago is the place to be. The job opportunities in finance, tech, and creative fields are vast. The social and cultural scene is unparalleled. You can build a network, explore diverse neighborhoods, and enjoy a nightlife that doesn’t exist in a CDP. The higher costs are the price of admission for an unparalleled urban experience.
For retirees, Glasgow CDP is the clear choice. The financial advantage of lower costs and a higher median income (if you're moving with savings) goes a long way. The slower pace, milder climate, and safer environment are ideal for a relaxing retirement. Chicago offers world-class healthcare and cultural venues, but the cold winters and urban hustle can be less appealing in later years.
PROS:
CONS:
PROS:
CONS:
This isn’t about which city is objectively “better”—it’s about which one is better for you.
Choose Chicago if you value energy, opportunity, and culture over safety and savings. You’re willing to trade a higher crime rate and harsh weather for the chance to live in a world-class city.
Choose Glasgow CDP if you value safety, community, and financial efficiency. You’re willing to trade the buzz of a metropolis for a quieter, more affordable life where your dollar goes further and you feel more secure.
The choice is yours.