St. Paul vs Chicago

Category / Metric	St. Paul	Chicago
Financial Overview
Median Income	$73,975	$74,474
Unemployment Rate	4%	4.2%
Housing Market
Median Home Price	$295,738	$365,000
Price per SqFt	$189	$261
Monthly Rent (1BR)	$1,327	$1,507
Housing Cost Index	112.7	110.7
Cost of Living
Groceries Index	96.0	103.3
Gas Price (Gallon)	$2.67	$3.40
Safety & Lifestyle
Violent Crime (per 100k)	567.0	819.0
Bachelor's Degree+	46.5%	45.7%
Air Quality (AQI)	34	38

Chicago vs. St. Paul: The Ultimate Midwest Showdown

So, you’re looking at the Midwest and trying to decide between two heavy hitters: the Windy City and the Midway Capital. On the surface, they share a lot—brutal winters, a love of sports, and a deep history. But dig a little deeper, and you’ll find two cities that offer wildly different lifestyles.

This isn’t just about which city has better pizza (hint: it’s Chicago, obviously). It’s about where your paycheck goes further, where you’ll feel safe, and where you can build a life. Let’s break it down.

The Vibe Check: Big City Energy vs. Capital Calm

Chicago is a beast. With a population of 2.66 million, it’s a true global city that never sleeps. The vibe here is fast-paced, ambitious, and culturally dense. You’re talking about world-class museums, a skyline that defines architecture, and neighborhoods so distinct they feel like separate towns. It’s for the person who craves anonymity, diversity, and the feeling that anything is possible on a given Tuesday night.

St. Paul, on the other hand, is the quieter, more grounded twin. With just over 303,000 people, it feels more like a large town than a sprawling metropolis. As the state capital, its energy is more bureaucratic and academic—think a blend of government employees, university students (from the University of Minnesota), and families who value space and community. It’s for the person who wants big-city amenities (theaters, pro sports) without the overwhelming crush of a city of millions.

The Verdict:

• For the Hustler & Culture Junkie: Chicago. You need the energy and the options.
• For the Balanced Life Seeker: St. Paul. You want access without the chaos.

---

The Dollar Power: Where Does Your Salary Actually Go?

Let’s talk money. The median incomes are nearly identical—$74,474 for Chicago vs. $73,975 for St. Paul. But the cost of living tells a different story. This is where the "purchasing power" gap becomes clear.

Here’s how the monthly expenses stack up for a single person:

Expense Category	Chicago	St. Paul	The Takeaway
Rent (1BR)	$1,507	$1,327	St. Paul wins, saving you ~$180/month.
Utilities	$180	$175	Essentially a tie. It’s cold everywhere.
Groceries	$420	$395	St. Paul edges out slightly.
Housing Index	110.7	112.7	St. Paul is marginally more expensive relative to the national average.

Salary Wars & Purchasing Power

If you earn $100,000 in Chicago, your effective take-home after taxes is roughly $75,000. In St. Paul, you’d take home about $73,500. The difference isn’t huge, but it matters.

Here’s the math on your monthly budget:

• Chicago: $75,000 / 12 = $6,250. After rent ($1,507), you have $4,743 for everything else.
• St. Paul: $73,500 / 12 = $6,125. After rent ($1,327), you have $4,798 for everything else.

Winner: St. Paul. You keep nearly the same amount of cash after housing, giving you a slight edge for savings or discretionary spending. However, Chicago salaries often run higher in top industries (finance, tech, logistics), which can close this gap entirely.

Taxes: Both states have a progressive income tax, but Illinois has a flat 4.95% rate, while Minnesota’s ranges from 5.35% to 9.85%. For high earners, Minnesota’s tax bite is larger. However, property taxes in Chicago can be notoriously high, partially offsetting the income tax advantage.

---

The Housing Market: Buy vs. Rent

Buying a Home:
The median home price in Chicago is $365,000. In St. Paul, it’s $295,738. That’s a $69,262 difference. Over a 30-year mortgage at 6.5%, that translates to roughly $430 more per month in Chicago.

But it’s not just about the price tag. The competition is fierce in both markets, but in different ways.

• Chicago: It’s a Seller’s Market. You’re competing against investors and a massive pool of buyers. For the median price, you’re looking at a condo or a small single-family home in a neighborhood that’s maybe 20-30 minutes from the downtown core. Starter homes are getting harder to find.
• St. Paul: Also a Seller’s Market, but more accessible. Your $295k goes much further. You can find a classic, spacious single-family home in a safe, family-friendly neighborhood. The competition is still there, but it’s less cutthroat than in Chicago’s desirable suburbs.

Renting:
Rental inventory is tighter in Chicago, driving up prices. St. Paul offers better value, with more availability and lower average rents. If you’re not ready to commit to a 30-year loan, St. Paul gives you more breathing room.

The Verdict:

• For Fresh Starts on a Budget: St. Paul. You get more house for your money.
• For Urban Investors & Long-Term Equity: Chicago. The market is more liquid, and property values in prime neighborhoods have immense long-term growth potential.

---

The Dealbreakers: Weather, Crime, and Commute

This is where personal preference clashes with hard data.

1. Traffic & Commute

Chicago has some of the worst traffic in the nation. The average commute time is around 35 minutes. The public transit system (the "L") is extensive and a lifesaver, but it can be crowded and slow during peak hours. Driving in the city is an exercise in patience and finding (and paying for) parking.

St. Paul is a different beast. It’s part of the Twin Cities metro, which is built for cars. The average commute is shorter, around 25 minutes. Traffic exists, but it’s manageable. Public transit is less comprehensive than Chicago’s, so owning a car is almost a necessity.

Winner: St. Paul. For easier driving and shorter commutes.

2. Weather: The Brutal Reality

Both cities are winter hellscape territory. Let’s be honest.

• Chicago: Infamous for its wind, but the real story is the deep cold and snow. Average winter lows dip to 21°F. The "Lake Effect" snow can dump feet of snow in hours. Summers are hot and humid (86°F+).
• St. Paul: Actually gets colder. Average winter lows are 16°F. It’s inland, so less lake-effect snow, but it gets more consistent snowfall and brutal cold snaps. Summers are similarly humid and warm.

Winner: Neither. It’s a tie for misery. But if you hate wind, St. Paul might be marginally less blustery. If you hate the absolute coldest temps, Chicago is slightly warmer on average.

3. Crime & Safety

Let’s address the elephant in the room. Both cities have neighborhoods with significant crime, but the city-wide statistics paint a clear picture.

City	Violent Crime Rate (per 100k)
Chicago	819.0
St. Paul	567.0

St. Paul has a 31% lower violent crime rate than Chicago. This is a significant difference. While both cities have safe, family-oriented neighborhoods, the city-wide average is a real factor. St. Paul feels, and statistically is, safer on a macro level. This is a major consideration for families and anyone concerned with personal safety.

Winner: St. Paul. By a notable margin.

---

The Final Verdict: Which City Should You Choose?

There’s no one-size-fits-all answer, but data points to clear winners for different life stages.

• Winner for Families: St. Paul. The combination of lower crime rates, more affordable housing (getting a $295k single-family home vs. a $365k Chicago property), and generally less intense traffic makes it a more stable, less stressful environment for raising kids.
• Winner for Singles/Young Professionals: Chicago. If you can swing the higher rent ($1,507 monthly) and navigate the competitive housing market, the sheer volume of networking events, nightlife, cultural institutions, and career opportunities in a city of 2.66 million is unmatched in the Midwest. Your social and professional life will be richer.
• Winner for Retirees: St. Paul. This is a tough call due to the weather, but St. Paul wins on cost and safety. You’ll get more house for your money, lower property taxes (often), and a safer environment. The smaller scale is also easier to navigate as you age.

Chicago: Pros & Cons

Pros:

• World-class culture: Museums, theater, architecture, and food scene are top-tier.
• Economic powerhouse: Unmatched job opportunities in finance, tech, and logistics.
• Public transit: One of the best systems in the U.S., making car-free living possible.
• Global city feel: Anonymity and diversity are built-in.

Cons:

• Cost: Higher rent, higher home prices, and steeper overall cost of living.
• Crime: Significantly higher violent crime rate. Neighborhood choice is critical.
• Weather & Traffic: Brutal winters and notoriously bad traffic.
• Competition: From the job market to the housing market, everything is more competitive.

St. Paul: Pros & Cons

Pros:

• Affordability: More house for your money, lower rent, and better purchasing power.
• Safety: A 31% lower violent crime rate than Chicago.
• Manageable Scale: Easier commutes, less overwhelming feel, strong sense of community.
• Access to the Twin Cities: You get the benefits of the larger metro area (sports, airports, malls) without living in the densest part.

Cons:

• Smaller Job Market: Fewer Fortune 500 HQs and niche career opportunities compared to Chicago.
• Car Dependency: Public transit is decent but not as comprehensive; you’ll likely need a car.
• The "Midwest" Feel: Less international flair and cultural intensity than Chicago.
• Weather: Just as cold, if not colder, with less lake-effect snow moderation.

The Bottom Line: If you’re chasing the pinnacle of Midwest urban life and your career can support the cost, Chicago is the undisputed king. But if you’re looking for a balanced, affordable, and safer place to put down roots without sacrificing big-city amenities, St. Paul offers incredible value and a higher quality of life for the average earner. Choose the city that matches your ambition and your tolerance for cold.