Texas Health and Science University vs Carnegie Mellon University

Side-by-side comparison across admissions, costs, outcomes, campus life, and more. Data from US Department of Education.

πŸ’°
Best Value
Carnegie Mellon University
Lower Net Price
πŸ’Ό
High Earners
Carnegie Mellon University
Higher 10yr Salary
πŸ†
Most Selective
Carnegie Mellon University
Harder to get in
πŸŽ“
Graduation
Carnegie Mellon University
Higher success
Admissions Difficulty
Acceptance Rate
Not reported
11.4%
Avg SAT Score
Not reported
1,545
SAT Range (25th–75th)
Not reported
1500 – 1570
Avg ACT Score
Not reported
34
ACT Range (25th–75th)
Not reported
34 – 35
Cost & Financial Aid
Avg Net Price
Not reported
$31,671
Tuition (In-State)
Not reported
$63,829
Tuition (Out-of-State)
Not reported
$63,829
Pell Grant Rate % students receiving Pell Grants
Not reported
15.2%
Federal Loan Rate
Not reported
35.5%
Career Outcomes
Median Salary (10yr)
$0
$114,862
Graduation Rate
62.9%
92.0%
Retention Rate Freshmen who return for 2nd year
Not reported
97.0%
Campus Life
Total Enrollment
Not reported
7,187
Undergrad Enrollment
25
7,497
Type
Private
Private
Setting
Urban
Urban

πŸ“‹ Report Cards

Texas Health and Science University

Academics
C
Value
C
Admissions
C
Diversity
C+

Carnegie Mellon University

Academics
A+
Value
C
Admissions
A+
Diversity
A+

βš–οΈ Expert Analysis

Texas Health and Science University and Carnegie Mellon University are both well-regarded institutions, but they differ in important ways. Here's how they compare across key dimensions.

Career Outcomes: Graduates from Carnegie Mellon University earn a median salary of $114,862 ten years after enrollment, which is $114,862 more than Texas Health and Science University graduates ($0).

Graduation: Carnegie Mellon University leads with a 92.0% graduation rate.

Bottom Line: Carnegie Mellon University stands out as both more affordable and producing higher-earning graduates β€” making it the stronger value proposition overall.

Want to explore more options?