University of Connecticut-Waterbury Campus vs University of New Hampshire at Manchester
Side-by-side comparison across admissions, costs, outcomes, campus life, and more. Data from US Department of Education.
University of Connecticut-Waterbury Campus
University of New Hampshire at Manchester
π Report Cards
University of Connecticut-Waterbury Campus
University of New Hampshire at Manchester
βοΈ Expert Analysis
University of Connecticut-Waterbury Campus and University of New Hampshire at Manchester are both well-regarded institutions, but they differ in important ways. Here's how they compare across key dimensions.
Admissions: University of Connecticut-Waterbury Campus is more selective with a 87.0% acceptance rate compared to University of New Hampshire at Manchester's 87.3%. Average SAT scores are 1070 and 1140 respectively.
Cost: University of Connecticut-Waterbury Campus offers a lower average net price at $8,896, which is $4,406 less than University of New Hampshire at Manchester ($13,302). After financial aid, this can make a significant difference over 4 years.
Career Outcomes: Graduates from University of Connecticut-Waterbury Campus earn a median salary of $73,997 ten years after enrollment, which is $7,518 more than University of New Hampshire at Manchester graduates ($66,479).
Graduation: University of New Hampshire at Manchester leads with a 64.1% graduation rate, and freshman retention rates are 79.5% vs 68.2%.
Campus Size: University of Connecticut-Waterbury Campus is the larger campus with 746 total students, while University of New Hampshire at Manchester has 486.
Bottom Line: University of Connecticut-Waterbury Campus stands out as both more affordable and producing higher-earning graduates β making it the stronger value proposition overall.
Want to explore more options?