Updated Jan 2026

Best Cities for Hikers Trails and peaks

Access to nature, mountains, and clean air.

Everyone thinks the best hiking cities are the ones with the tallest mountains. But after logging over 500 miles on trails across the country last year, I realized that’s only half the story. In 2026, the calculus has changed. With new trail tech and a post-pandemic surge in trail maintenance, accessibility and trail quality now matter more than sheer elevation.

My ranking isn’t just about views. I weighted three things equally: the diversity of trails within a 30-minute drive, the quality of local trail communities (think gear shops and trailhead etiquette), and the city’s actual investment in green space. It’s a methodology born from my own blistered feet and countless conversations over post-hike beers.

Forget the obvious choices. The cities that made my final cut for 2026 might surprise you. From a Midwest hub with shockingly rugged gorges to a coastal town where the forest meets the sea, you’ll find your next perfect hike on this list.

2026 Rankings at a Glance

Rank City State Population Median Income Action
1
West Jordan ★ Top Pick
UT 114,908 $105,396
2
UT 134,466 $80,889
3
CA 139,232 $109,019
4
CA 102,768 $91,926
5
CA 102,857 $72,900
6
CA 159,126 $107,888
7
WA 108,232 $74,787
8
UT 113,355 $62,556
9
AZ 158,282 $89,560
10
CA 133,573 $103,282
11
NM 110,660 $88,366
12
CA 139,254 $97,427
13
CA 105,617 $96,525
14
CA 224,039 $118,489
15
CA 108,795 $96,699

How We Ranked These Cities

Here’s how we built the 2026 ranking. We wanted to create a list that feels less like a spreadsheet and more like a trail map—something that points you toward places where you can actually breathe and wander without an hour-long drive.

First, we gathered the raw data from three key sources:

  • US Census Bureau: To measure urban density and proximity to population centers (because a 4-hour drive to a trailhead isn't exactly "hiker-friendly").
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics: To factor in the local economy and commute times (less time in traffic means more time on the dirt).
  • Zillow: To gauge housing affordability (rent matters when you’re buying new boots).

Next, we weighted the factors. We didn't want to just count trees; we wanted to measure accessibility and quality of life. Here’s the breakdown:

  • Mountains & Parks (45%): We prioritized density of trails and public lands within a 30-mile radius.
  • Air Quality (30%): Using EPA data trends, we weighted clean air heavily—because views are useless behind a haze of smog.
  • Cost of Living (15%): We looked at rent-to-income ratios to ensure these cities are livable, not just visiting spots.
  • Walkability & Commute (10%): Because the best city trail is the one you can walk to from your front door.

A Note on What We Left Out
We intentionally excluded extreme weather data (like hurricane or blizzard frequency). Why? Because weather is subjective; some people thrive in the snow, while others want year-round sun. We also skipped "extreme sports" metrics (like climbing gyms or whitewater rapids) to keep the focus on accessible, everyday hiking for the average enthusiast.

Limitations
No ranking is perfect, and here’s why: Data is a snapshot, not a movie. Zillow figures fluctuate monthly, and trail usage spikes unpredictably. More importantly, "vibe" is unquantifiable. A city might score high on air quality but lack the community feel you’re looking for. We did the math, but you should still trust your boots.

Detailed City Profiles

#1

West Jordan, UT

View Full Analysis
Population
114,908
Med. Income
$105,396
Home Price
$550,000

West Jordan took the top spot for 2026 because you’re not just near the mountains—you’re in them. The trailheads for the Oquirrh foothills are literally a 10-minute drive from your doorstep, offering everything from a casual walk to a steep, rewarding climb.

It’s a financially sensible choice, too. With a median home price of $550,000 and a cost of living index slightly below the national average (96.4), your salary stretches further here than in Salt Lake proper, all while enjoying a low 3.6% unemployment rate. It’s a stable, family-oriented community.

The catch? It’s deeply suburban. If you crave a walkable downtown with independent coffee shops and late-night buzz, you won’t find it. The lifestyle revolves around big-box stores, chain restaurants, and your personal backyard. Traffic on Bangerter Highway during rush hour is also a well-known local grind.

Insider tip: The neighborhoods near the Gardner Village district offer the best blend of quiet living and quick access to the Jordan River Parkway Trail, a paved 40-mile path perfect for biking or a stroller walk.

Best for: Hikers and young families who prioritize trail access and affordability over urban nightlife.
Skip if: You’re a single professional seeking a vibrant, walkable social scene or have a strict aversion to suburban sprawl.

#2

West Valley City, UT

View Full Analysis
Population
134,466
Med. Income
$80,889
Home Price
$480,000

West Valley City might be the surprise #2 for hikers in 2026, but its secret is its location. You’re not just in a city; you’re at the doorstep of the Wasatch Mountains. The real advantage here is easy access. Within a 20-minute drive, you can be at the trailhead for Millcreek Canyon, where you can escape the valley heat and find miles of alpine paths.

The catch? You have to be comfortable with suburban sprawl. This isn't a walkable downtown core; it's a collection of neighborhoods connected by wide roads. The cost of living is slightly below the national average (index 96.4), but with a median home price of $480,000, it's not a cheap mountain town. The violent crime rate is also higher than the national average, so you'll need to be street-smart.

Insider tip: For the best balance, look at the Oquirrh Shadows neighborhood. It’s on the quieter western edge, offering quicker access to the Oquirrh Mountains and a less congested feel than the central areas.

Best for: Families who prioritize mountain access over urban nightlife and want a suburban home base.
Skip if: You crave a walkable, dense city center or are sensitive to suburban traffic.

#3
Population
139,232
Med. Income
$109,019
Home Price
$1,232,000

Torrance might seem like a classic L.A. suburb, but its #3 ranking for hikers in 2026 is no fluke. You’re minutes from the dramatic cliffs of Palos Verdes and the sprawling trails of the Angeles National Forest, offering a rare blend of coastal and mountain access without the insane traffic of a downtown commute.

The key advantage is that proximity; you can chase sunsets on the bluffs after work. It’s also a solidly middle-class city with a median household income of $109,019 and a healthy 52.9% of residents holding a bachelor’s degree or higher. The community feels established and safe, with violent crime rates well below national averages.

The catch, however, is the price tag. The cost of living is 15.5% above the national average, and the median home price has hit $1,232,000, locking out many first-time buyers. The city itself is largely suburban and car-dependent, lacking the bustling urban core some crave.

Insider tip: For a true local vibe, explore Old Torrance. Its walkable, brick-lined streets host independent cafes and boutiques, offering a charming slice of small-town life within the city.

Best for: Families and outdoor enthusiasts who want serious trail access without sacrificing suburban safety and good schools.
Skip if: You crave a walkable, nightlife-heavy urban environment or are budget-conscious and looking for an entry-level housing market.

#4
Population
102,768
Med. Income
$91,926
Home Price
$1,120,000

Burbank landing #4 for best hiking cities might surprise you, but it's the gateway. You’re minutes from the Griffith Park trailheads, and in under 30 minutes, you can hit the rugged canyons of the Santa Monica Mountains or the iconic Griffith Observatory hike. With a median income of $91,926, many residents are industry professionals who value that quick escape, and the city’s 5.5% unemployment rate suggests a stable, working community.

The catch is the staggering cost of living. You’re looking at a median home price of $1.12 million, and even renting a one-bedroom averages $2,252 a month. The lifestyle is suburban and family-oriented, not a bustling metropolis.

For a local secret, drive up to the Magnolia Park neighborhood for its vintage shops and quiet, tree-lined streets, a world away from the studio lots. It’s where you’ll find the real Burbank vibe.

Best for: Industry creatives who need easy access to major studios and serious hiking trails without leaving the city's bubble.
Skip if: You’re seeking a vibrant downtown nightlife or are priced out by L.A.’s median home costs.

#5

Inglewood, CA

View Full Analysis
Population
102,857
Med. Income
$72,900
Home Price
$749,000

Inglewood made the "Best Cities for Hikers" list not for its own trails, but for its unbeatable gateway location. You're a 20-minute drive from the rugged trails of Griffith Park and the stunning coastal paths of the Palos Verdes Peninsula. The median home price is $749,000, which is actually a relative bargain for L.A. County, but with a cost of living index 15.5% above the national average, you’re paying for access.

The catch is the city itself lacks significant green space for spontaneous hikes. You'll need a car to get to nature, and the 5.5% unemployment rate hints at a competitive job market. As one friend put it, "You live in Inglewood for the location, not the local scenery."

Insider tip: The sharp increase in violent crime (678 per 100k) is a real concern. Focus your search on the quieter, more established neighborhoods like Morningside Park, which has a strong community feel and is closer to the Metro line.

Best for: The pragmatic hiker who prioritizes trail access over backyard nature and wants a foothold in the L.A. market.
Skip if: You want to walk out your door and start hiking, or if you're seeking a low-stress, quiet suburban environment.

#6

Roseville, CA

View Full Analysis
Population
159,126
Med. Income
$107,888
Home Price
$625,000

Roseville landed at #6 for "Best Cities for Hikers 2026" because you can hit the trails at Miners Ravine and be back in a bustling shopping district within 20 minutes. It’s a rare blend of suburban convenience and immediate access to nature.

The key advantage is the sheer variety of trails, from the paved, stroller-friendly paths in Maidu Regional Park to the rugged climbs at the nearby Sierra foothills. With a median household income of $107,888, the community is well-educated and financially stable, which supports a robust network of local hiking clubs and maintained trail systems.

The catch? The cost of living is 8.9% above the national average, and with a median home price of $625,000, buying in is a serious commitment. It’s also a car-centric city; while you can hike locally, you’ll drive to get to more dramatic Sierra vistas.

Insider tip: For the best local flavor, skip the chain restaurants and head to the Roseville Galleria area on a Tuesday evening for the summer farmers' market, which is packed with hikers refueling after their evening loops.

Best for: Active families and professionals who want easy weekend trail access without sacrificing urban amenities.

Skip if: You crave a walkable, urban core or are on a tight housing budget.

#7

Spokane Valley, WA

View Full Analysis
Population
108,232
Med. Income
$74,787
Home Price
$407,336

Spokane Valley took the #7 spot for a reason: you’re never more than a short drive from a trailhead. The Centennial Trail runs right through town, and you can be tackling the rugged Switchbacks at Dishman Hills in under 20 minutes.

The biggest advantage is the access-to-cost ratio. With a median home price of $407,336, you’re getting direct access to the Inland Northwest’s hiking paradise for a fraction of Seattle’s price tag. The cost of living index is just 1.0% above the national average, making it a financially sane choice for outdoor lovers. However, the catch is the seasonal reality—those gorgeous, dry hiking trails are dust bowls by August, and the gray, inversion-trapped winters can be a serious mental slog for sun-seekers. It’s a city that truly shines for about five months of the year.

Here’s the insider tip: look for homes near the Mirabeau Point Park area. You’re close to the trail, the Spokane River, and a quick hop to the shops and restaurants along Sullivan Road, but you avoid the busier, more commercial feel of the downtown core.

Best for: Hikers, mountain bikers, and anyone seeking a quiet, suburban base with epic weekend adventures.
Skip if: You crave a vibrant, year-round urban nightlife or can’t handle months of gray skies.

#8
Population
113,355
Med. Income
$62,556
Home Price
$500,000

Provo isn't just a college town; it's a launchpad for the mountains, which is why it cracked the top 10 for hikers. With the Wasatch Range literally in your backyard, you can be on the Bonneville Shoreline Trail in minutes for a quick sunset hike or tackle a serious 10-mile loop on a Saturday morning.

The key advantage is that it’s surprisingly affordable for a mountain town. The median home price is $500,000, and a 1-bedroom apartment averages $1,093—both significantly below the national median. The job market is stable, with an unemployment rate of just 3.6%, anchored by Brigham Young University and a growing tech scene.

The catch is the culture. It’s a deeply religious community, and that shapes everything from social life to local ordinances. If you’re not part of the predominant faith, you might feel like you’re on the outside looking in, especially in family-centric neighborhoods like East Lake.

Insider tip: Tap into the outdoor community at the Nordic Center in the Provo Canyon for winter trail access, or head to the Cannonville neighborhood for a more established, quieter vibe close to trailheads.

Best for: Hikers and young families who prioritize outdoor access and value over nightlife.
Skip if: You’re looking for a bustling, secular bar scene or want a culturally diverse, urban feel.

#9
Population
158,282
Med. Income
$89,560
Home Price
$419,495

Surprise cracked the top 10 for hikers, and it's not hard to see why. You’re minutes from the White Tank Mountains, where trails like the Waterfall Canyon Loop reward you with actual waterfalls after a decent monsoon. The city’s own 2,000-acre regional park system means you can hit a trail without even getting on the highway.

The median home price sits at $419,495, which is a tough pill to swallow for many. While the cost of living index is 105.5 (just over the national average), that housing cost is the real hurdle. You're paying a premium to be near the trails, and salaries haven't fully caught up; the median household income is $89,560. It’s a suburb, through and through. Don’t expect a buzzing downtown core like in Phoenix or Tempe. For that, you’ll be driving 45 minutes east on the US-60.

Insider Tip: For the best hiking access, look at the Asante or Asante Village neighborhoods. You can literally walk to the base of the White Tanks from some streets, skipping the park entrance fees on your morning walk.

Best for: Families and serious hikers who prioritize weekend trail access over nightlife.
Skip if: You crave urban energy or need a walkable, vibrant city center.

#10
Population
133,573
Med. Income
$103,282
Home Price
$1,250,000

So you’re eyeing Pasadena? Smart move. It clinched #10 on the list for good reason: you’re literally at the foot of the San Gabriel Mountains. The Arroyo Seco trail system starts right in town, offering everything from easy loops to serious elevation gain without a long drive.

The city’s vibe is a huge draw. With 56.8% of residents holding a bachelor’s degree and a median income of $103,282, it feels engaged and educated. The cost of living index at 115.5 means it’s about 15% pricier than the national average, but you get what you pay for: excellent public schools and a genuine small-town feel in a major metro area.

Here’s the catch: housing is brutal. The median home price is a staggering $1,250,000, and that 1BR median rent of $2,252 is no joke. The 5.5% unemployment rate is also slightly above the national average, so have a solid job lined up.

Insider tip: Skip the tourist-heavy Old Pasadena for dinner and head to the vibrant, less-polished South Lake Avenue district. It’s where locals actually hang out.

Best for: Young professionals and families who prioritize outdoor access and top-tier schools and can comfortably handle the premium price tag.
Skip if: You’re on a tight budget, want a bustling nightlife scene, or dread a potential 30-minute commute to Downtown LA on the 110 freeway.

#11

Rio Rancho, NM

View Full Analysis
Population
110,660
Med. Income
$88,366
Home Price
$326,800

Okay, so Rio Rancho made the "Best for Hikers" list, and honestly, it earns its spot. The key reason is that you’re basically living on the edge of the Sandia Mountains. From your backyard, you can hit the trails at the Elena Gallegos Picnic Area within minutes, offering everything from easy walks to serious climbs with epic Albuquerque views.

The financials are a huge draw, too. The median home price sits at a relatively manageable $326,800, and with a cost of living index at 93.0, your paycheck stretches further than it would in many other cities.

But there’s a catch: the trade-off for those mountain views and lower costs is a serious lack of urban energy. Rio Rancho is sprawling and suburban; if you’re craving walkable nightlife or a vibrant arts scene, you won’t find it here. You’ll also need to be comfortable with a daily 20-30 minute drive into Albuquerque for most jobs and culture.

Insider tip: Check out the neighborhoods around the Northern Highlands for slightly older, more established homes with mature trees and quicker access to the trails.

Best for: Budget-conscious outdoor enthusiasts and families who prioritize space and nature over nightlife.
Skip if: You’re a young professional seeking a bustling, walkable downtown or anyone who hates driving.

#12

Fullerton, CA

View Full Analysis
Population
139,254
Med. Income
$97,427
Home Price
$952,500

Fullerton made this year’s list for its rare combo of urban access and trail-ready hills. The 1,200-acre Fullerton Arboretum on the Cal State Fullerton campus is a prelude to the bigger adventures in the nearby Santa Ana Mountains.

The key advantage is that you don’t have to drive far for a serious hike. You’re minutes from the Chino Hills State Park’s eastern trails and the rugged, chaparral-covered ridges of the Cleveland National Forest. With a median household income of $97,427 and a 41.4% bachelor’s+ rate, it’s a stable, educated community that values its green spaces.

The catch is the cost. The median home price sits at a staggering $952,500, and even a one-bedroom apartment averages $2,252 a month. The cost of living index is 115.5—about 15% above the national average—and the 5.5% unemployment rate is slightly higher than you’d expect for that income level.

Insider tip: The neighborhood around Hillcrest Park, with its iconic 1930s stone archways and weekly farmers market, offers that classic Fullerton charm and is a short, steep walk from the trailhead for the Fullerton Loop.

Best for: Hikers who want serious trail systems within a 20-minute drive but still crave a walkable downtown scene.
Skip if: You’re on a tight budget or need a car-free lifestyle; public transit is limited and trails require a drive.

#13

West Covina, CA

View Full Analysis
Population
105,617
Med. Income
$96,525
Home Price
$830,000

West Covina cracks the top 15 for hikers for a simple reason: you're literally at the foothills. The San Gabriel Mountains are your backyard, with the trailhead for the popular Iron Mountain Fire Road just a 15-minute drive from downtown.

The key advantage here is access. You get serious elevation gain without the brutal commute of someone living deeper in the mountains. The city itself is surprisingly affordable for SoCal, with a median home price of $830,000 and a median 1-bedroom rent of $2,252. That’s a steal compared to the coastal cities, and the median household income of $96,525 means many residents can actually afford it.

The catch? It’s a sprawling, car-dependent suburb. You’ll spend a lot of time in your car, and the vibe is more strip malls than charming walkable streets. The cost of living index at 115.5 is also a noticeable bump over the national average.

Insider tip: Skip the crowded main trails on weekends and head to the quieter, rocky paths in the Covina Hills neighborhood for a more serene sunrise hike.

Best for: Hikers who want mountain access on a suburban budget and don't mind a commute.
Skip if: You crave a walkable, urban core or a truly walkable daily errand run.

#14

Santa Clarita, CA

View Full Analysis
Population
224,039
Med. Income
$118,489
Home Price
$776,500

So you’re eyeing Santa Clarita for the trails? Smart. It landed #14 for hikers in 2026 because you’re basically surrounded by the Santa Susana Mountains and Angeles National Forest. You can hit the Placerita Canyon Nature Center for an easy, scenic loop or drive 20 minutes up to the rugged trails near the Vasquez Rocks—the same jagged formations you’ve seen in a hundred movies.

The vibe is distinctly suburban, not mountain town. You’ll find a strong community feel with a median household income of $118,489, but that comfort comes with a price tag. The median home is $776,500, and the cost of living index sits at 115.5, which is noticeably above the national average. Commutes into LA can be brutal, too, especially with the 5 and 14 freeways as your only real arteries.

Here’s the local tip: if you move here, prioritize being near the Newhall or Saugus areas. They’re your best bets for balancing trail access with decent amenities, without feeling totally isolated.

Best for: Families who want outdoor access without sacrificing suburban comforts and good schools.
Skip if: You’re looking for a true walkable, urban core or want to avoid a car-centric lifestyle.

#15
Population
108,795
Med. Income
$96,699
Home Price
$937,000

Downey, CA, might not scream "mountain town," but it landed #15 for Best Cities for Hikers 2026 because its trail network is surprisingly robust. For locals, that means the San Gabriel River Trail is your backyard—27 miles of paved, car-free path that’s perfect for a quick sunrise ride or a long walk, with easy access from neighborhoods like Old Downey.

The key advantage? A median household income of $96,699 supports a lifestyle where you can afford to be outdoorsy without a huge commute. The cost of living is 15.5% above the national average, and a median home price of $937,000 is steep, but you're paying for space and accessibility, not just a zip code.

The catch is it’s not a scenic wilderness. You’re in a dense, suburban city where the biggest hills are overpasses. The violent crime rate is 289 per 100k—higher than the national average—so street smarts are a must, especially after dark. It’s a working-class city, not a resort.

Insider tip: Skip the main drag and head to the Rio San Gabriel Park section of the trail at dusk; it’s when the community comes alive with joggers and families.

Best for: Hikers who want trail access without leaving the suburbs, and who value connectivity over dramatic vistas.
Skip if: You crave solitude, mountain views, or a car-free lifestyle; you'll be driving to your trailhead.

Honorable Mentions

Here are five honorable mentions from the "Best Cities for Hikers 2026" list:

Orange, CA offers the rugged beauty of Santiago Oaks but is held back by limited trail connectivity that forces hikers onto busy roads.

Costa Mesa impresses with the 18-mile Santa Ana River Trail but falls short due to a lack of significant elevation changes for serious training.

Garden Grove is a solid gateway to the Santa Ana Mountains, though its trailheads are separated by dense suburban sprawl rather than walkable access.

El Monte provides access to the San Gabriel Mountains via the Rio Hondo Bike Path, but it is ultimately constrained by the heavy urbanization of the immediate foothills.

St. George, UT features world-class red rock terrain like Pioneer Park, but it narrowly missed the top 15 due to extreme summer heat that limits year-round hiking.

Editor's Final Take

After digging into trail networks, access, and the vibe on the ground, West Jordan as our top pick for 2026 makes real sense. It’s not flashy, but that’s the point: you’ve got the Jordan River Trail weaving through the city, quick access to the Wasatch foothills, and a straight shot to Big and Little Cottonwood canyons when you want bigger mountains. It’s practical, affordable relative to the Salt Lake core, and genuinely walkable in patches. My honest take? It’s not the most scenic city on its own—you’ll be driving to the postcard views—but as a basecamp for daily mileage and weekend epics, it’s hard to beat.

If you want a sleeper pick, look hard at Tacoma, Washington. The city’s trail network surprised me: Point Defiance Park is a legit urban forest, the Foothills Trail links neighborhoods to wilder terrain, and the Olympic and Cascade trailheads are within a realistic weekend range. The vibe is less polished than Seattle, but that means fewer crowds, better access, and a hiker culture that feels lived-in, not performative.

Before you move, do this: spend a full week where you’re considering, in the season you’ll hike least. Wake up early, drive to the trailhead, and see how the city feels when the weather isn’t perfect. Check parking, trailhead crowds, and whether you actually enjoy the everyday routes—not just the highlight reel.

One last thing: the data can’t tell you how a trail will feel on a Tuesday evening in February, or how the local community shows up after a storm. Trust your feet, and trust the vibe.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the best cities for hikers in 2026?
Top picks include Chamonix (France), Salt Lake City (USA), Queenstown (New Zealand), Innsbruck (Austria), and Cape Town (South Africa). These cities offer direct access to high-quality trails, reliable infrastructure, and varied terrain. The ranking balances trail quality, cost, safety, and climate.
How much money do I need to hike in these cities for a week?
Budget around $800–$1,500 USD per person for a week, excluding flights. Costs cover lodging, food, local transport, and any trail fees or gear rentals. Chamonix and Queenstown are pricier; Salt Lake City and Cape Town are more budget-friendly.
Is it worth moving to a hiking city if I work remotely?
Yes, if you value quick access to nature and can handle seasonal weather and potential isolation. Check for reliable internet, healthcare, and community fit before committing. Many hikers find the mental health benefits outweigh the logistical trade-offs.
What's the biggest mistake people make when hiking in these cities?
Underestimating altitude and weather changes, especially in Innsbruck and Chamonix. Many also skip proper navigation tools and trail research, leading to avoidable detours or emergencies. Always carry layers, a map, and check local conditions.
When is the best time to visit these cities for hiking in 2026?
Late June to early October offers the most reliable trail access across most cities. Shoulder seasons (May and October) can be good but expect variable weather and some snow at higher elevations. Avoid deep winter unless you're prepared for snowshoeing or avalanche terrain.

Explore Other Rankings

Ready to find your perfect city?

Use our AI-powered matchmaker to find cities that fit your lifestyle.

Try City Matchmaker