San Antonio, TX
Pop. 1,495,312
A compensation and residency framework—not a promise that big-city pay follows the worker.
The old article assumed workers could keep San Francisco or New York compensation while moving to lower-cost cities. Ocity has no employer-policy or remote-adoption field. Salary portability must be documented for the specific employer and role.
Compare what the offer is really worth after tax, rent, and local purchasing power, then decide whether to counter.
Run the full after-tax, cost-of-living, and first-year math before you accept an offer.
Set a floor, target, and stretch ask using your current city and target city.
Turn city, tax, and housing data into a stronger counteroffer ask.
Follow the full workflow from offer review to relocation planning and city tradeoffs.
| # | City | COL Index | $50K → Buys |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Antonio, TX | 94 | $106,724 |
| 2 | El Paso, TX | 90 | $110,865 |
| 3 | Albuquerque, NM | 93 | $107,527 |
| 4 | Oklahoma City, OK | 91 | $109,890 |
| 5 | Tucson, AZ | 94 | $106,045 |
| 6 | Kansas City, MO | 93 | $107,181 |
| 7 | Memphis, TN | 92 | $108,225 |
| 8 | Columbus, OH | 95 | $105,820 |
| 9 | Indianapolis, IN | 95 | $105,708 |
| 10 | Laredo, TX | 88 | $113,895 |
Source: C2ER/ACCRA Cost of Living Index, US Census ACS. US Average COL = 100. Higher "Buys" = more purchasing power.
Pop. 1,495,312
Pop. 678,945
Pop. 560,283
Pop. 702,654
Pop. 547,232
| City | COL | 1BR rent | Income | Home price | Walkability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Antonio, TX | 93.7 | $1,197 | $62,322 | $264,900 | 75 |
| El Paso, TX | 90.2 | $980 | $57,317 | $247,000 | 65 |
| Albuquerque, NM | 93.0 | $1,005 | $67,907 | $300,100 | 65 |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 91.0 | $884 | $67,015 | $269,000 | 65 |
| Tucson, AZ | 94.3 | $1,018 | $55,708 | $320,000 | 65 |
| Kansas City, MO | 93.3 | $1,098 | $65,225 | $325,000 | 65 |
| Memphis, TN | 92.4 | $1,146 | $51,399 | $199,950 | 65 |
| Columbus, OH | 94.5 | $1,065 | $62,350 | $309,000 | 65 |
| Indianapolis, IN | 94.6 | $1,145 | $66,629 | $250,000 | 65 |
| Laredo, TX | 87.8 | $881 | $60,720 | $282,999 | 55 |
Lower destination costs can improve a budget only if compensation, taxes, benefits and employment remain workable. Median city income does not predict what a remote employee will keep.
Pop. 510,671
Pop. 618,655
Pop. 909,074
Pop. 874,182
Pop. 252,974
Start with compensation confirmed in writing. Record any geographic pay adjustment, payroll state, benefits, travel requirement, equipment, coworking and tax-preparation cost. Compare destination after-tax income with actual housing, utilities, transport, healthcare and travel back to the employer.
Run three scenarios: salary unchanged, salary adjusted downward and job loss. Include the cost of a return move and enough cash for a new local job search. Confirm that the employer can legally employ residents in the destination state.
This page owns salary-policy and budget intent. The digital-nomad companion owns address, connectivity and short-stay verification.
This article uses $50K as a benchmark, but your situation is unique. Use our free tools to calculate your exact purchasing power in any of these cities.
Displayed city values come from Ocity’s production cities snapshot exported July 12, 2026. Ocity does not currently store verified city-level broadband speed, coworking inventory, remote-work adoption, employer location policy, insurance premiums, procedure prices, provider networks, hospital quality or patient outcomes.
This refresh therefore does not rank cities using those unavailable fields. Current local service, employer and healthcare data must be verified from dated primary sources before a decision.
Use the table for general cost context and the checklist for source verification. Do not treat citywide economic fields as evidence of remote-work suitability or healthcare affordability.
Explore the data